Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 2, 2024

Tyler v. New York City Department of Education

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:24-cv-01947
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Tyler v. New York City Department of Education, Judge Swain ordered Teresa Tyler to pay fees or submit an IFP application before the case could proceed.

Who this affects

Teresa Tyler and the pending case against the New York City Department of Education; the order required Tyler to pay the filing fees or submit an IFP application before the case could proceed.

What happened

Teresa Tyler submitted Tyler v. New York City Department of Education to the Southern District of New York by email. The court assigned it docket number 24-CV-1947 (LTS). Tyler had to either pay the required fees or ask to proceed without paying them in advance.

The order gave Tyler 30 days to pay $405 or submit a completed and signed application to proceed without prepaying fees. Until one of those steps occurred, the court would take no further action, and no summons or answer would be required. If Tyler did not comply or request more time, the action would be dismissed without prejudice to refiling.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed these steps and stated that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, so Tyler could not proceed without prepaying appeal fees based on this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Tyler v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:24-cv-01947
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
Apr. 2, 2024

Background

Teresa Tyler submitted this civil action to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by email. The court assigned docket number 24-CV-1947 (LTS). The order does not describe the underlying claims.

Payment or IFP application

Federal law requires a plaintiff beginning a civil action either to pay the required fees or to submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying them. This type of application is commonly called an in forma pauperis, or IFP, application. The court stated that the required amount was $405, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee, subject to possible updates to the fee schedule.

The court ordered Tyler, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the fees or complete, sign, and submit the attached IFP application if she could not afford them. The order provided instructions for payment by mail or in person. It stated that no further action would be taken, and no summons would issue or answer would be required, until the fees were paid or a completed and signed IFP application was received.

Effect of compliance or noncompliance

If Tyler complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If the court granted the IFP application, Tyler would be allowed to proceed without prepaying the fees. If she failed to comply within the deadline, or failed to request an extension of time, the action would be dismissed without prejudice to refiling.

Ruling

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered Tyler to pay the fees or submit the IFP application within 30 days. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.