Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 1, 2024

Cuccia v. HF Management Services, LLC

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:24-cv-02091
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Cuccia v. HF Management, Judge Cronan ordered Cuccia to serve and file a complaint after removal because her summons lacked factual allegations.

Who this affects

Cuccia must serve and file a complaint by May 1, 2024; the defendants must serve the order on her and file proof of service.

What happened

In Cuccia v. HF Management Services, LLC, HF Management Services removed the case from New York state court even though Cuccia had not yet filed a complaint. She had served a summons with notice that identified the statutes supporting her claims but did not include factual allegations.

The court explained that New York law allowed Cuccia to begin the case with a summons and notice, but the document had to provide enough information to serve the notice function of a federal pleading after removal. The court found that the summons did not meet the federal pleading standard because it contained no factual allegations.

Judge John P. Cronan ordered Cuccia to serve a complaint on the defendants and file it on the docket by May 1, 2024. The defendants had to serve the order on Cuccia and file proof of service.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cuccia v. HF Management Services, LLC · No. 1:24-cv-02091
Judge
John Cronan
Date
Apr. 1, 2024

Background

HF Management Services, LLC, doing business as Healthfirst, Inc., filed a notice removing the action from the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. HF Management Services stated that Cuccia had started the action on or around August 7, 2023, and had served it with a summons with notice through the New York State Secretary of State on or around December 1, 2023. HF Management Services said it did not receive notice of the action until March 13, 2024. It removed the action on March 20, 2024, with the consent of Genesis Bayuelo-Perri.

The opinion states that Cuccia had not filed a complaint. HF Management Services appeared to have removed the action without first filing a demand for service of a complaint under New York Civil Practice Law and Rules section 3012(b).

Court’s Analysis

The court explained that federal procedural rules apply after removal, while state law governs whether service of process was sufficient before removal. New York law permits a plaintiff to begin an action by filing and serving a summons with notice without including a complaint or other formal pleading. After removal, however, federal courts accept state-court papers as the operative pleadings only when they provide the notice function required of pleadings under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The court found that Cuccia’s summons with notice did not satisfy Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8. The summons identified the statutes under which Cuccia sought relief but did not include factual allegations.

Order

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 81(c)(2), the court ordered Cuccia to serve a complaint on the defendants by May 1, 2024, and file the complaint on the docket. The defendants were directed to serve the order on Cuccia and file proof of service. The order did not decide the merits of Cuccia’s claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.