Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 3, 2024

Hall v. NYC Water Board

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:24-cv-02483
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Hall v. NYC Water Board, Judge Swain ordered Anthony Winston Hall to pay $405 or correct his request to proceed without fees.

Who this affects

Anthony Winston Hall and the further processing of his case; the action will be dismissed if he does not pay the fees or submit an amended application within 30 days.

What happened

In Hall v. NYC Water Board, Anthony Winston Hall filed the case without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying court fees. His application did not provide enough information about his finances.

The court gave Hall 30 days to either pay $405 or submit a corrected application explaining why he cannot afford the fees. The court also said that no summons would issue yet and that the case would be dismissed if he did not comply.

Judge Swain issued the order and denied fee-free status for any appeal, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hall v. NYC Water Board · No. 1:24-cv-02483
Judge
John Cronan
Date
Apr. 3, 2024

Background

Anthony Winston Hall brought this action without a lawyer and submitted an application to proceed without paying the court’s filing fees. The court explained that starting a civil case requires either payment of $405—consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee—or a signed application showing that the plaintiff cannot afford those fees.

Court’s Analysis

The court found that Hall’s application did not provide enough information to establish that he was unable to pay. Although Hall stated that he was unemployed and had no income, he did not provide his last employment date or former gross monthly wages, and he did not explain how he paid his monthly living expenses. Apart from stating that he had $100 in a bank account, he also left unanswered questions about cash and bank accounts, property, monthly expenses, dependents, debts, and other financial obligations.

Order

The court ordered Hall, within 30 days, to either pay the $405 in fees or submit an amended application. The amended application must use docket number 24-CV-02483 (LTS) and provide facts establishing that Hall cannot afford the fees. If the court grants the amended application, Hall may proceed without paying the fees in advance.

No summons would issue at that time. The court stated that the case would be processed through the Clerk’s Office if Hall complied, but that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply within the allowed time. The court also certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.