Perez v. Molina
- Barbara Moses
- 1:23-cv-00801
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Perez v. Molina, Magistrate Judge Moses ordered Perez to provide information to identify three unnamed corrections officers.
Jarrell D. Perez and the three unidentified defendants referred to as Captain Mulbrav, Captain Smith, and Captain Shaw; the New York City Law Department and Department of Corrections must respond after Perez provides the ordered information.
What happened
In Perez v. Molina, Jarrell D. Perez sought to pursue claims against three defendants identified as Captain Mulbrav, Captain Smith, and Captain Shaw. The Department of Corrections could not identify them from the information available.
Because Perez is representing himself, the court offered help identifying the defendants. It ordered him to provide more details by April 11, 2024, including names or badge numbers if known, when and where he interacted with each officer, how they interacted with him, and physical descriptions.
Magistrate Judge Moses ordered the Law Department and the Department of Corrections to identify the defendants, if possible, and provide service addresses or state whether the agency would accept service within 30 days after receiving Perez’s information. The order did not decide the underlying claims.
The detailed version
- Perez v. Molina · No. 1:23-cv-00801
- Barbara Moses
- Apr. 5, 2024
Background
The court had previously ordered service of the complaint and asked the individual defendants—described as current or former officers or employees of the New York City Department of Corrections—to waive service. The Department of Corrections declined to waive service for defendants identified as “Captain Mulbrav,” “Captain Smith,” and “Captain Shaw.” It stated that it had no employee named “Mulbrav” and needed more information to identify “Captain Smith” and “Captain Shaw.” The New York City Law Department repeated at an April 4, 2024 case-management conference that the Department of Corrections lacked enough information to identify these defendants.
Order
Relying on the rule that a person representing himself in court is entitled to assistance identifying a defendant, the court ordered Perez to submit a letter by April 11, 2024 if he wished to continue pursuing claims against these three defendants. The letter must provide, if known, each defendant’s first name and badge number; the exact date and approximate time of Perez’s interaction with each defendant; the specific location; how the defendant approached or interacted with him; and a physical description, including approximate height and weight, gender, and skin, eye, and hair color.
Within 30 days after Perez provides the information, the Law Department and the Department of Corrections must identify the defendants, if possible, and either provide addresses where they can be served or state whether the Department of Corrections will accept service for them. The order addressed identification and service only; it did not resolve the merits of Perez’s claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.