Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 8, 2024

Phoenix Fashion, Inc. v. Saadia Group LLC

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:23-cv-05788
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Phoenix Fashion v. Saadia Group, Judge Liman ordered a jurisdiction letter because the complaint omitted citizenship details needed for diversity jurisdiction.

Who this affects

Phoenix Fashion, Inc. must address the pleading of diversity jurisdiction in a letter to the court. The order concerns the citizenship information for Saadia Group LLC, Fashion to Figure EComm LLC, Lord & Taylor EComm LLC, and their members.

What happened

Phoenix Fashion, Inc. v. Saadia Group LLC concerns whether the complaint adequately pleaded federal diversity jurisdiction.

The complaint relied on diversity jurisdiction but did not identify the citizenship of Saadia Group LLC, Fashion to Figure EComm LLC, or Lord & Taylor EComm LLC, or the citizenship of those companies’ members.

Judge Lewis J. Liman directed Phoenix Fashion to file a letter by April 11, 2024, addressing whether diversity jurisdiction was properly pleaded. The order did not decide the underlying dispute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Phoenix Fashion, Inc. v. Saadia Group LLC · No. 1:23-cv-05788
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
Apr. 8, 2024

Issue

The complaint invoked diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The court questioned whether the complaint adequately pleaded the citizenship information required to establish that jurisdiction.

Court’s Analysis

The complaint did not specify the citizenship of Saadia Group LLC, Fashion to Figure EComm LLC, or Lord & Taylor EComm LLC, or the citizenship of their members. The court cited the rule that, for diversity purposes, a limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its members.

Order

The court directed Phoenix Fashion, Inc. to file a letter by April 11, 2024, addressing whether diversity jurisdiction was properly pleaded. The order was signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman. The opinion does not state that the court dismissed the action or reached the merits of the parties’ dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.