Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 10, 2024

Preservation Technologies LLC v. Time USA, LLC

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:23-cv-10611
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

Judge Vyskocil dismissed Preservation Technologies v. Time USA after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by May 10, 2024.

Who this affects

Preservation Technologies LLC and Time USA, LLC; the action was discontinued following the parties’ reported settlement in principle.

What happened

Preservation Technologies LLC told the court that it and Time USA, LLC had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and allowed it to be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and applied by May 10, 2024. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order on April 10, 2024.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Preservation Technologies LLC v. Time USA, LLC · No. 1:23-cv-10611
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Apr. 10, 2024

Background

Preservation Technologies LLC filed a letter informing the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the proposed settlement’s terms.

Court’s Order

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. The discontinuance was without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing, provided that an application to restore the action was made by May 10, 2024.

The court further stated that if no application to restore the action was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order on April 10, 2024.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.