Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 10, 2024

Munoz-Hilliard v. Mount Sinai Morningside Hospital

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:24-cv-02598
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Munoz-Hilliard v. Mount Sinai Morningside Hospital, Judge Caproni ordered the pro se plaintiff to sign his complaint within 30 days or face dismissal without prejudice.

Who this affects

Antonio A. Munoz-Hilliard must submit a signed complaint within 30 days or the action will be dismissed without prejudice; the order also addresses his optional consent to electronic service and any appeal from the order.

What happened

In Munoz-Hilliard v. Mount Sinai Morningside Hospital, Antonio A. Munoz-Hilliard filed a complaint without a lawyer, but the complaint was unsigned. The court said that court filings submitted by an unrepresented party must be personally signed.

The court ordered Munoz-Hilliard to submit a signed complaint within 30 days. The order explains acceptable original and electronic signatures and requires the filing to include docket number 24-CV-2598 (VEC). Munoz-Hilliard may also submit a signed form consenting to receive court documents electronically.

Judge Valerie Caproni said the action will be dismissed without prejudice if Munoz-Hilliard does not submit the signed complaint on time. Judge Caproni also denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees, stating that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Munoz-Hilliard v. Mount Sinai Morningside Hospital · No. 1:24-cv-02598
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Apr. 10, 2024

Background

Antonio A. Munoz-Hilliard brought the action without a lawyer against Mount Sinai Morningside Hospital and Jenny Ng. The complaint he submitted was unsigned. The court cited Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a) and the Southern District of New York's local rule, which require an unrepresented party to sign a pleading, written motion, or other paper.

Order

The court directed Munoz-Hilliard to submit a signed copy of the complaint within 30 days of the order. If submitted by mail or in person, the complaint must contain an original signature. If submitted by email, it must comply with the court's electronic filing rules and may use an electronic signature in the signature block or a typed name preceded by “/s/” in the signature block. The filing must be labeled with docket number 24-CV-2598 (VEC).

The court stated that if Munoz-Hilliard fails to submit a signed complaint within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. “Without prejudice” means the order does not bar a later filing based on the same matter, although the opinion does not further explain the effect of any later filing.

Munoz-Hilliard also submitted an unsigned consent form for receiving court documents electronically. The court explained that he must submit a properly signed consent form if he wishes to receive documents electronically. The order notes that consenting to electronic service would mean he would no longer receive court documents by regular mail.

Other Ruling and Disposition

Judge Valerie Caproni certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. The court therefore denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fees. The order did not decide the underlying claims against the defendants.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.