Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 12, 2024

Fields v. Walgreen Eastern Co., Inc.

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:24-cv-02750
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Fields v. Walgreen Eastern, Judge Rochon ordered settlement discussions and a joint status letter without deciding the case’s merits.

Who this affects

Billy Fields and the defendants, who must meet and confer, consider settlement-related options, and submit a joint letter on the required schedule.

What happened

Fields v. Walgreen Eastern Co., Inc. is a case in which the court ordered the parties to try to settle the action soon after the summons and complaint are served.

The parties must meet for at least one hour within 30 days and discuss whether the plaintiff has met the requirement of having standing to sue. If they cannot settle, they must also discuss whether court-connected mediation or a settlement conference with a magistrate judge would be useful.

Within 45 days of service, the parties must submit a joint letter stating whether they settled and, if not, asking either for mediation or a settlement conference or for an initial status conference. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon did not decide standing or the merits of the case in this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Fields v. Walgreen Eastern Co., Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-02750
Judge
Rochon
Date
Apr. 12, 2024

Order

The court ordered the parties to meet and confer for at least one hour within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint. The meeting must be a good-faith attempt to settle the action.

The parties must discuss whether the plaintiff has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing, meaning the requirement that a plaintiff be entitled to bring the case in federal court. The order cites Second Circuit decisions concerning standing but does not decide whether the plaintiff has standing.

Further proceedings

If the parties cannot settle on their own, they must discuss whether additional settlement discussions through the district court’s mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive at that time.

Within 15 additional days—45 days after service of the summons and complaint—the parties must submit a joint letter stating whether they settled. If they did not settle, the letter must ask the court either to refer the case to mediation or to a magistrate judge for a settlement conference, while stating the parties’ preference, or to proceed with an initial status conference.

Disposition

This is a procedural settlement and case-management order. It does not resolve the standing issue, the merits of the claims, or the parties’ ultimate rights.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.