Socha v. Garfield Development Corp.
- Edgardo Ramos
- 1:23-cv-07372
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Socha v. Garfield Development Corp., Judge Ramos entered a $90,000 judgment after Socha accepted defendants’ federal settlement offer, subject to stated exceptions.
Zbigniew Socha and the listed defendants, including the corporate defendants, Pete Comas, and Alan Garfield; the order also addresses Socha’s attorney, preserved claims, and specified proceedings.
What happened
In Socha v. Garfield Development Corp., the defendants offered to let judgment be entered for Zbigniew Socha for $90,000. Socha accepted the offer on or about April 12, 2024.
The judgment covers damages, back pay, statutory amounts, interest, attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses through April 12, 2024. It also includes a broad mutual release, but preserves specified personal-injury, workers’ compensation, health-benefit, later-arising, agency, and other claims.
Judge Edgardo Ramos ordered the judgment, required Socha to withdraw a city human-rights complaint, set interest at 9% annually after 60 days, and directed how the payment would be divided between fees, wages, and liquidated damages.
The detailed version
- Socha v. Garfield Development Corp. · No. 1:23-cv-07372
- Edgardo Ramos
- Apr. 15, 2024
Background
The defendants—Garfield Development Corp., 144 West 70th Street LLC., 146 Development Corp., 225 W. 16 St. Corp., 864 W.E. Corp., 866-8 Development Corp., Bridges Creek Realty Company, L.L.C., Chelsea Equities LLC, Strata Realty Corp., West Side Equities LLC., Pete Comas, and Alan Garfield—made an offer under Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The offer allowed judgment against the defendants and in favor of Zbigniew Socha for $90,000, inclusive of damages, liquidated damages, prejudgment and postjudgment interest, unpaid back wages, spread-of-hours pay, statutory penalties and interest, attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses through the date of the offer. Socha accepted the offer and filed a notice of acceptance.
Judgment
The court entered judgment for Socha against the defendants in the amount of $90,000. The order does not describe the underlying causes of action or decide the merits of those claims. It instead records the judgment that followed from Socha’s acceptance of the defendants’ offer.
Release and exceptions
The order provides for a mutual release of claims and liabilities through the date judgment is entered, subject to stated exceptions. The exceptions include Socha’s personal-injury claims arising from an alleged February 28, 2023 accident in a New York state-court action and his workers’ compensation case. The order also preserves any claim under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, unemployment-insurance or workers’ compensation rights, claims arising after acceptance of the offer, rights under the offer itself, claims that cannot be waived under applicable law, and certain rights concerning government discrimination-agency proceedings. It further preserves claims against employees Nazarii Sukharskyi and Jaroslaw Skornicki concerning lost or stolen items.
Socha must immediately withdraw his complaint before the New York City Human Rights Commission. He represented that, apart from the claims and matters identified in the order, he was not presently aware of other existing or potential claims against the defendants.
Payment and interest
Socha waived interest on the judgment for 60 days. After that period, interest accrues at 9% per year. The defendants must pay one-third of the judgment directly to Socha’s attorney as attorneys’ fees. Half of Socha’s remaining share must be paid as wages subject to taxes and withholdings and reported on Internal Revenue Service Form W-2; the other half must be paid without withholdings as non-wage liquidated damages and reported on Form 1099. Socha or his counsel must file a satisfaction of judgment within five days after receiving payment.
Disposition and classification
Judge Edgardo Ramos ordered the judgment on April 15, 2024. Because the order entered judgment based on an accepted offer rather than resolving the underlying legal claims on their merits, this is classified as a procedural order.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.