Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 15, 2024

Mattera v. Xian E

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:24-cv-01970
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Mattera v. Xian E, Judge Liman ordered Mattera to provide a workable address or seek permission for another service method.

Who this affects

Joseph Mattera and Lin Xian E, particularly Mattera's obligation to provide information needed to serve the defendant.

What happened

In Mattera v. Xian E, Joseph Mattera, who is representing himself, sued Lin Xian E. Mattera had permission to proceed without paying filing fees, but the address he supplied for Xian E did not appear workable.

The court explained that serving someone outside the United States may require following federal rules and an international service treaty. If Mattera cannot find a physical address after making reasonable efforts, the court may allow another method, such as email, if it is reasonably likely to reach Xian E.

Judge Lewis J. Liman ordered Mattera to file a letter within 60 days providing a workable mailing address or describing his efforts to find one and asking to use another service method. The court said it may dismiss the claim for failure to prosecute if Mattera does not file the letter or request more time.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mattera v. Xian E · No. 1:24-cv-01970
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
Apr. 15, 2024

Background

Joseph Mattera brought an action against Lin Xian E and is proceeding without a lawyer. Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain had granted Mattera permission to proceed without paying filing fees. In such cases, court officers can assist with issuing and serving court papers. However, the address Mattera provided for Lin Xian E did not appear to be a viable mailing address.

Service Rules

The court reviewed the federal rules governing service of a complaint. Generally, a complaint must be served within 90 days after it is filed, although a different timing rule may apply when service is made in another country. Service on an individual outside the United States is governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f), while service on a corporation outside the United States is governed by Rule 4(h)(2). Service abroad may also require compliance with the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, an international treaty. Service through the foreign country's designated Central Authority is the primary method under that treaty.

The court also explained that, in some circumstances, a foreign defendant whose physical address cannot be found may be served by another method reasonably calculated to reach the defendant, including email. That possibility depends on the plaintiff first making reasonable efforts to discover a physical mailing address.

Order

The court directed Mattera to file a letter within 60 days that does one of two things: (1) provides a viable mailing address for Lin Xian E; or (2) explains the steps Mattera took to find the address and asks the court to authorize service by another method. If applicable, the 90-day service period will begin on the date Mattera files that letter. The court did not dismiss the claim. It stated that it may dismiss the claim for failure to prosecute if Mattera does not file the letter within 60 days or request an extension of time. Judge Lewis J. Liman issued the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.