Kerr v. City of New York
- Sarah Netburn
- 1:23-cv-04492
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Kerr v. City of New York, Judge Netburn approved the settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice.
The plaintiffs and the City of New York; the settlement was approved and the action was dismissed with prejudice.
What happened
In Kerr v. City of New York, the plaintiffs and the City of New York submitted a proposed settlement to the court for review.
The opinion does not describe the claims, the settlement’s terms, or the parties’ positions. It states only that the court reviewed the proposed settlement.
Judge Sarah Netburn found the settlement fair and reasonable, approved it, and dismissed the action with prejudice, barring the action from being brought again.
The detailed version
- Kerr v. City of New York · No. 1:23-cv-04492
- Sarah Netburn
- Apr. 16, 2024
Background
The plaintiffs, including Rohan Kerr, and the City of New York presented a proposed settlement to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The opinion does not state the claims asserted or provide the settlement’s terms.
Ruling
The court reviewed the proposed settlement under the standard described in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House and determined that it was fair and reasonable. Judge Sarah Netburn approved the settlement.
Disposition
The court dismissed the action with prejudice. The opinion does not provide further details about the settlement or the claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.