Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 18, 2024

Sanchez v. Clipper Realty, Inc.

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:21-cv-08502
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Sanchez v. Clipper Realty, Inc., Judge Failla ordered defendants to produce putative class members’ wage notices as relevant discovery.

Who this affects

The defendants must produce wage notices issued to putative class members; the order also leaves the plaintiff’s standing question unresolved.

What happened

In Sanchez v. Clipper Realty, Inc., the plaintiff asked to include putative class members’ wage notices in a sample of wage records sought from the defendants.

The defendants argued that the request was late and that the wage-notice claims could not proceed as a class action because the plaintiff allegedly lacked a concrete injury required for federal standing.

Judge Katherine Polk Failla ordered the defendants to produce the wage notices, finding them relevant discovery, and said it was too early to decide whether the plaintiff had standing to bring the wage-notice claim.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sanchez v. Clipper Realty, Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-08502
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
Apr. 18, 2024

Background

The plaintiff requested that the defendants include wage notices issued to putative class members in a sample of wage records. The request followed an earlier order limiting the defendants’ production to a sample of paystubs and timesheets for between 10% and 15% of putative class members.

The defendants opposed adding the wage notices. They argued that the request was not included in the plaintiff’s earlier discovery request and was therefore an improper attempt to expand the scope of the earlier order. They also argued that the plaintiff’s claims under New York Labor Law § 195(1) were subject to dismissal for lack of Article III standing because the complaint alleged technical violations without showing a concrete injury.

Ruling

The court found that the wage notices were relevant to a party’s claim or defense and constituted discoverable information under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1). The court ordered the defendants to produce the wage notices.

The court also ruled that any assessment of whether the plaintiff had standing to bring the New York Labor Law § 195(1) claim was premature. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the pending motion at docket entry 104. The order did not decide whether the plaintiff ultimately had standing or whether the claim could proceed as a class action.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.