Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 24, 2024

Andy Ryan Photographer, LLC v. Greenell Corporation

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:23-cv-08451
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Andy Ryan Photographer v. Greenell, Judge Vyskocil dismissed the settled action without costs, allowing restoration by May 24, 2024 if settlement failed.

Who this affects

The parties to Andy Ryan Photographer, LLC v. Greenell Corporation; the action was discontinued, subject to a possible restoration request by May 24, 2024.

What happened

Andy Ryan Photographer, LLC v. Greenell Corporation involved a settlement that the parties had reached in principle.

The court discontinued the case without costs to any party and allowed it to be restored to the court’s calendar if the parties could not put their settlement in writing, provided they applied by May 24, 2024.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Andy Ryan Photographer, LLC v. Greenell Corporation · No. 1:23-cv-08451
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Apr. 24, 2024

Background

The court was informed that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

Ruling

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by May 24, 2024. The order states that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal of the action would be with prejudice.

Effect

The case was dismissed under the settlement-related order, subject to the stated deadline for seeking restoration.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.