Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 23, 2024

Yung v. NYC Mayor Adams

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-02948
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Yung v. NYC Mayor Adams, Judge Swain transferred Yung’s detention challenge to the Eastern District of New York without deciding its merits.

Who this affects

John Yung’s detention challenge was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York; the merits of his detention claim remain undecided.

What happened

In Yung v. NYC Mayor Adams, John Yung, who appeared without a lawyer, asked a federal court to review his detention without bail in a pending state criminal case. The opinion says he appeared to be held before trial at the Otis Bantum Correctional Center on Rikers Island.

The Southern District of New York explained that a detention challenge generally belongs where the relevant custodian or criminal proceedings are located. Because Yung’s case appeared to be pending in Kings County, which is in the Eastern District of New York, the court transferred the action there without deciding whether his detention was lawful.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the clerk to transfer the case and closed it in the Southern District of New York. The Eastern District will decide whether Yung may proceed without paying the filing fee, and the court denied permission to appeal without prepaying that fee.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Yung v. NYC Mayor Adams · No. 1:24-cv-02948
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Apr. 23, 2024

Background

John Yung filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus, a request for court review of allegedly unlawful custody. The opinion states that he appeared to be a pretrial detainee held at the Otis Bantum Correctional Center on Rikers Island. He challenged detention without bail connected to criminal proceedings that he seemed to allege were pending in New York Supreme Court, Kings County, under case number IND-71296-23/001.

Yung did not pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed without prepaying it in the Southern District of New York.

Reason for Transfer

The court explained that a court hearing a detention challenge generally must have authority over the detainee’s custodian, and that jurisdiction generally lies in the federal district where the person is confined. The opinion states that Rikers Island is generally understood to be within both the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. It further states that Kings County is in the Eastern District of New York.

Because the criminal proceedings appeared to be pending in Kings County, the court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York in the interest of justice under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).

Ruling and Effect

The court directed the clerk to transfer the action to the Eastern District of New York and stated that the transfer closed the action in the Southern District of New York. It did not decide whether Yung’s detention without bail was lawful. The transferee court will decide whether Yung may proceed without prepaying the filing fee. The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying the fee.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.