Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 23, 2024

Pena v. NY1 Transmissions Inc.

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:23-cv-05672
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureEmployment
In one sentence

In Pena v. NY1 Transmissions Inc., Judge Torres ordered discussion of vacating default certificates, postponed the hearing, and did not decide default judgment.

Who this affects

Ivan Pena, NY1 Transmissions Inc., and Motke Barnes; the order required the parties to confer and postponed the scheduled hearing.

What happened

In Pena v. NY1 Transmissions Inc., Ivan Pena sued NY1 Transmissions Inc. and Motke Barnes under federal and New York wage laws. The Clerk issued certificates of default after Pena reported that the defendants had been served but had not appeared or answered.

The defendants later appeared through counsel and asked the court to deny Pena’s request for a default judgment. The court explained that default judgments are generally disfavored and that courts consider whether the default was deliberate, whether denying default judgment would harm the plaintiff, and whether the defendants may have valid defenses.

Judge Torres ordered the parties to discuss whether they would jointly ask to vacate the certificates of default and to file either that proposed agreement or a joint letter stating their positions by June 1, 2024. The court also referred the matter to mediation by a separate order and postponed the July 16, 2024 show-cause hearing. It did not decide the default-judgment request.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Pena v. NY1 Transmissions Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-05672
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Apr. 23, 2024

Background

Ivan Pena sued NY1 Transmissions Inc. and Motke Barnes for alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law. Pena requested certificates of default, stating that NY1 had been served through the New York Secretary of State and that Barnes had been personally served, but that neither defendant had appeared or answered. The Clerk issued certificates of default on December 14, 2023.

On April 20, 2024, counsel appeared for the defendants and filed a memorandum asking the court to deny Pena’s motion for a default judgment. A default judgment is a judgment entered when a party fails to defend the case, but the court emphasized that such judgments are generally disfavored because courts prefer to resolve disputes on their merits.

Court’s Standard

The court stated that, when deciding whether to enter a default judgment, courts consider whether the default was deliberate, whether denying the motion would prejudice the plaintiff, and whether the defaulting parties may have potentially valid defenses. When there is doubt about whether a default should be entered or vacated, that doubt generally favors the defaulting party.

Order

The court directed the parties to discuss whether they intended to file a joint stipulation—an agreement submitted to the court—asking to vacate the certificates of default. By June 1, 2024, the parties had to file either the proposed joint stipulation or a joint letter stating each party’s position. The court also stated that it would refer the matter to mediation by separate order.

The show-cause hearing scheduled for July 16, 2024, was adjourned without setting a new date. Judge Torres did not grant or deny Pena’s motion for a default judgment in this order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.