Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 25, 2024

Gattuso v. Hamilton

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:24-cv-02880
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Gattuso v. Hamilton, Judge Broderick ordered the self-represented plaintiff to sign his complaint within 30 days or face dismissal without prejudice.

Who this affects

Matthew Anthony Gattuso, who was ordered to sign and return the complaint’s signature page within 30 days. The order stated that the action would proceed if he complied and would be dismissed without prejudice if he did not.

What happened

In Gattuso v. Hamilton, Matthew Anthony Gattuso brought the case without a lawyer, but the complaint he submitted was unsigned. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 requires an unrepresented party to sign court papers personally.

The court ordered Gattuso to return a signature page within 30 days. A handwritten signature was required for documents mailed or delivered in person; for documents emailed under the court’s procedures, he could use an electronic signature or a typed name preceded by “/s/.”

Judge Vernon S. Broderick stated that the case would proceed if Gattuso complied. If he did not comply within the allowed time, the court would dismiss the action without prejudice. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal and directed the Clerk to mail the order to Gattuso.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gattuso v. Hamilton · No. 1:24-cv-02880
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Apr. 25, 2024

Background

Matthew Anthony Gattuso filed this action without a lawyer. The complaint submitted to the court did not contain a signature.

Rule and Court’s Analysis

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a) requires every pleading, written motion, and other paper to be signed. When a party is not represented by a lawyer, the party must sign personally. The court explained that a typed name alone does not satisfy the rule for a paper filed by mail or delivered in person. The court also noted that its electronic-filing procedures allow a self-represented party who submits a document by email to use an electronic signature or a typed name preceded by “/s/.”

Order

The court directed Gattuso to sign and submit the attached signature page within 30 days of the order. The signed document had to include docket number 1:24-CV-2880 (VSB). The court stated that the action would proceed if Gattuso complied. If he failed to comply within the allowed time, the court would dismiss the action without prejudice.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail a copy of the order to Gattuso.

Disposition

The court issued an order directing a signature; it did not dismiss the action in this order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.