Doncouse v. Kaiten Zushi Nomad LLC
- Vyskocil
- 1:24-cv-00439
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Doncouse v. Kaiten Zushi, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the settled action, allowing restoration by May 31, 2024, otherwise dismissal became with prejudice.
The parties to the action: Plaintiff Graciela Doncouse and the defendants, including Kaiten Zushi Nomad LLC. The case could be restored by May 31, 2024, if the settlement was not put in writing; otherwise, the dismissal became with prejudice.
What happened
In Doncouse v. Kaiten Zushi Nomad LLC, Plaintiff Graciela Doncouse told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to any party. The parties could ask to restore the case if they could not put their settlement in writing, but they had to do so by May 31, 2024.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that the dismissal would be with prejudice if no application to restore the action was made by that date.
The detailed version
- Doncouse v. Kaiten Zushi Nomad LLC · No. 1:24-cv-00439
- Vyskocil
- May 1, 2024
Background
Plaintiff Graciela Doncouse filed a letter informing the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
Court’s Order
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by May 31, 2024.
The order further stated that if no application to restore the action was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The opinion did not decide the underlying claims.
Judge
Mary Kay Vyskocil issued the order on May 1, 2024.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.