Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 6, 2024

Khen v. US Coachways, Inc.

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:23-cv-10762
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
DiscoveryCivil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In Khen v. US Coachways, Judge Rochon denied US Coachways’s motion to stay discovery because its Rule 12(c) motion had not yet been filed.

Who this affects

US Coachways, Inc. and the plaintiffs were affected: discovery was not paused, although US Coachways may renew its request after filing its Rule 12(c) motion.

What happened

In Khen v. US Coachways, Inc., US Coachways asked the court to pause the parties’ discovery schedule. The request came after the plaintiffs amended their complaint and before US Coachways’s deadline to respond had passed.

US Coachways said it intended to file an answer and a motion under Rule 12(c), which allows a party to seek judgment based on the pleadings. It asked the court to pause discovery until that motion was decided.

Judge Rochon denied the motion to stay discovery without prejudice. She said the court could not evaluate whether discovery should be paused until the Rule 12(c) motion was actually filed, and allowed US Coachways to renew its request afterward.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Khen v. US Coachways, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-10762
Judge
Rochon
Date
May 6, 2024

Background

The parties had a court-approved schedule for exchanging discovery demands. After the plaintiffs amended their complaint, US Coachways’s deadline to respond to the amended complaint had not yet expired. US Coachways told the court that it intended to file an answer and a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), which permits a party to seek judgment based on the pleadings.

US Coachways asked the court to stay, or pause, the discovery deadlines while the court considered its anticipated Rule 12(c) motion.

Court’s ruling

The court denied the motion to stay discovery without prejudice. The court explained that it could not decide whether discovery should be stayed based on a Rule 12(c) motion until that motion was filed. In considering a request to stay discovery, courts consider factors including the strength of the pending motion supporting the request.

The court stated that US Coachways may renew its motion to stay discovery after filing its Rule 12(c) motion. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon issued the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.