Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 7, 2024

Aulicino v. B&Z Auto Enterprises LLC

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:24-cv-03483
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Aulicino v. B&Z Auto Enterprises LLC, Judge Rochon ordered the defendant to clarify its LLC citizenship or face remand to state court.

Who this affects

B&Z Auto Enterprises LLC must provide additional information about its membership and citizenship. The case may be remanded to New York state court if B&Z cannot truthfully establish complete diversity. The order also affects Matthew M. Aulicino and his counsel by requiring service and a notice of appearance.

What happened

Aulicino v. B&Z Auto Enterprises LLC began in New York state court and was removed to federal court based on alleged diversity of citizenship. The defendant said the plaintiff was a Florida citizen and that the defendant was a New York citizen.

The court explained that an LLC’s citizenship depends on the citizenship of all its members. The defendant identified two members but did not identify the membership of one of them, so its removal papers did not provide all the required citizenship information.

Judge Rochon ordered B&Z Auto Enterprises LLC to amend its removal notice by May 17, 2024, to identify the citizenship of every person or entity in its membership. If it could not truthfully allege complete diversity, the case would be sent back to the New York Supreme Court in Bronx County. The order also required service on the plaintiff and directed the plaintiff’s lawyer to file a notice of appearance.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Aulicino v. B&Z Auto Enterprises LLC · No. 1:24-cv-03483
Judge
Rochon
Date
May 7, 2024

Background

B&Z Auto Enterprises LLC removed the action from the Supreme Court of New York, Bronx County, on May 6, 2024. It asserted that the federal court had diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a)(1) and 1441(a). The removal notice alleged that Matthew M. Aulicino was an individual residing in Florida and that B&Z had its principal place of business in New York. B&Z therefore asserted that Aulicino was a Florida citizen and that B&Z was a New York citizen.

Citizenship of the LLC

The court explained that a limited liability company is considered a citizen of every state where its members are citizens. A removal notice based on diversity jurisdiction must therefore identify the citizenship of each person who is an LLC member and, for any entity member, the entity’s place of incorporation and principal place of business. If an entity member is itself an LLC, the filing must provide the same information about that LLC’s membership.

B&Z’s Rule 7.1 statement identified two members: “Bobby Albert—New York” and “Denis & Co Holdings LLC—New York.” It did not identify the membership of Denis & Co Holdings LLC. The court concluded that the removal notice and Rule 7.1 statement did not fully establish the defendant LLC’s citizenship.

Order

The court ordered B&Z to amend its removal notice by May 17, 2024. The amendment must allege the citizenship of every constituent person or entity comprising B&Z, including the required information for corporate members and the membership of any LLC member.

The court further ordered that, if B&Z could not truthfully allege complete diversity of citizenship by that deadline, the action would be remanded to the Supreme Court of New York, Bronx County, without further notice. B&Z also had to serve Aulicino with the order within two business days and file proof of service. Aulicino’s counsel had to file a notice of appearance within two business days after service.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.