Aulicino v. B&Z Auto Enterprises LLC
- Rochon
- 1:24-cv-03483
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Aulicino v. B&Z Auto Enterprises LLC, Judge Rochon ordered the defendant to clarify its LLC citizenship or face remand to state court.
B&Z Auto Enterprises LLC must provide additional information about its membership and citizenship. The case may be remanded to New York state court if B&Z cannot truthfully establish complete diversity. The order also affects Matthew M. Aulicino and his counsel by requiring service and a notice of appearance.
What happened
Aulicino v. B&Z Auto Enterprises LLC began in New York state court and was removed to federal court based on alleged diversity of citizenship. The defendant said the plaintiff was a Florida citizen and that the defendant was a New York citizen.
The court explained that an LLC’s citizenship depends on the citizenship of all its members. The defendant identified two members but did not identify the membership of one of them, so its removal papers did not provide all the required citizenship information.
Judge Rochon ordered B&Z Auto Enterprises LLC to amend its removal notice by May 17, 2024, to identify the citizenship of every person or entity in its membership. If it could not truthfully allege complete diversity, the case would be sent back to the New York Supreme Court in Bronx County. The order also required service on the plaintiff and directed the plaintiff’s lawyer to file a notice of appearance.
The detailed version
- Aulicino v. B&Z Auto Enterprises LLC · No. 1:24-cv-03483
- Rochon
- May 7, 2024
Background
B&Z Auto Enterprises LLC removed the action from the Supreme Court of New York, Bronx County, on May 6, 2024. It asserted that the federal court had diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a)(1) and 1441(a). The removal notice alleged that Matthew M. Aulicino was an individual residing in Florida and that B&Z had its principal place of business in New York. B&Z therefore asserted that Aulicino was a Florida citizen and that B&Z was a New York citizen.
Citizenship of the LLC
The court explained that a limited liability company is considered a citizen of every state where its members are citizens. A removal notice based on diversity jurisdiction must therefore identify the citizenship of each person who is an LLC member and, for any entity member, the entity’s place of incorporation and principal place of business. If an entity member is itself an LLC, the filing must provide the same information about that LLC’s membership.
B&Z’s Rule 7.1 statement identified two members: “Bobby Albert—New York” and “Denis & Co Holdings LLC—New York.” It did not identify the membership of Denis & Co Holdings LLC. The court concluded that the removal notice and Rule 7.1 statement did not fully establish the defendant LLC’s citizenship.
Order
The court ordered B&Z to amend its removal notice by May 17, 2024. The amendment must allege the citizenship of every constituent person or entity comprising B&Z, including the required information for corporate members and the membership of any LLC member.
The court further ordered that, if B&Z could not truthfully allege complete diversity of citizenship by that deadline, the action would be remanded to the Supreme Court of New York, Bronx County, without further notice. B&Z also had to serve Aulicino with the order within two business days and file proof of service. Aulicino’s counsel had to file a notice of appearance within two business days after service.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.