Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 7, 2024

Wismeg v. CUS MF Powerhouse LLC

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:24-cv-00600
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Wismeg v. CUS MF Powerhouse LLC, Judge Caproni set procedures for resolving a mediated Fair Labor Standards Act settlement but did not approve it.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and defendants in this Fair Labor Standards Act case, as well as their attorneys, are affected by the court’s settlement-filing, approval, and dismissal requirements.

What happened

In Wismeg v. CUS MF Powerhouse LLC, the parties told the court that mediation had produced an agreement resolving all issues. The case involves claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage-and-hour law.

The court said the parties could not dismiss the case with prejudice based on the settlement unless the court or the Department of Labor approved it. The parties could instead file a dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A), but they would have to submit the required stipulation and a lawyer’s statement that the plaintiffs understood they could bring another lawsuit and that the settlement contained no release of the defendants.

Judge Valerie Caproni canceled all previously scheduled conferences and deadlines. She ordered that any approval request or stipulation be filed by June 7, 2024, and stated that a conference would occur on June 14 if nothing was filed. The order established settlement procedures; it did not approve the settlement or dismiss the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Wismeg v. CUS MF Powerhouse LLC · No. 1:24-cv-00600
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
May 7, 2024

Background

Taylor Wismeg, Cabrian Taggart, and Richard Medal sued CUS MF Powerhouse LLC, doing business as Coyote Ugly Saloon, and the individual defendants named in the caption. The plaintiffs brought claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. On May 7, 2024, the court was notified that the parties had reached an agreement through mediation on all issues.

Settlement-approval requirements

The court ordered that the parties may not dismiss the action with prejudice based on the settlement unless the settlement is approved by the court or the Department of Labor. If the parties seek court approval, they must file a joint letter motion and the settlement agreement on the public docket by June 7, 2024. The motion must explain why the settlement is fair and reasonable, including the parties’ claims and defenses, the litigation risks, whether experienced counsel negotiated at arm’s length, and the possibility of fraud or collusion.

The motion must also address whether there is a genuine dispute about the hours worked or compensation owed and identify the amount of attorney’s fees the plaintiffs’ lawyer will seek. The court stated that it generally would not approve a settlement filed under seal or in redacted form without special circumstances. It also warned that it was unlikely to approve a general release, or a release covering claims unrelated to the wage-and-hour claims in the complaint, unless the parties explain why such a provision is appropriate.

Dismissal without prejudice

The court noted that the Second Circuit has not decided whether an FLSA case may be settled without court or Department of Labor approval and dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A). If the parties choose that route, they must file a stipulation within 30 days. The stipulation must be accompanied by an affirmation from plaintiffs’ counsel stating that the plaintiffs were clearly advised that the settlement does not prevent them from filing another lawsuit against the same defendants and affirming that the settlement contains no release of the defendants. The court warned that this option creates a risk that the case could be reopened later.

Order and current status

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. If no approval motion or stipulation is filed by June 7, 2024, the court ordered a conference for June 14, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. The order did not approve the settlement, dismiss the action, or decide the underlying FLSA claims. The provided text ends during a warning about possible sanctions against attorneys, so that portion of the order is incomplete.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.