Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 9, 2024

Williford v. Firework

Judge
Rearden
Docket
1:24-cv-02335
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureEmploymentPro Se
In one sentence

In Williford v. Firework, Judge Rearden ordered the U.S. Marshals Service to serve defendants in Williford’s discrimination case.

Who this affects

Salina Williford, Firework doing business as Loop Technologies, and Deborah Vue; the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service were also directed to take service-related steps.

What happened

In Williford v. Firework, Salina Williford, representing herself, alleges that her employer and Deborah Vue discriminated against her because of her race and sex. She brought claims under federal and New York laws.

Because the court allowed Williford to proceed without prepaying filing fees, it directed the Clerk of Court to issue summonses and prepare the forms and documents needed for the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Firework, doing business as Loop Technologies, and Deborah Vue. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summonses are issued.

Judge Rearden also instructed Williford to ask for more time if service is not completed within that period and to notify the court in writing if her address changes. The order addressed service only and did not decide whether her discrimination claims are legally valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Williford v. Firework · No. 1:24-cv-02335
Judge
Rearden
Date
May 9, 2024

Background

Salina Williford filed this action without a lawyer against Firework and HR Chief Deborah Vue. The complaint asserts claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the New York State Human Rights Law. Williford alleges that her employer discriminated against her based on race and sex.

The court had previously granted Williford permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees. In such cases, the court stated that Williford was entitled to assistance from the court and the U.S. Marshals Service in serving the defendants.

Service Instructions

The court extended the time for service until 90 days after the summonses issue because Williford could not serve the defendants before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered the summonses issued. The Clerk of Court was instructed to issue summonses for Firework, doing business as Loop Technologies, and Deborah Vue; complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant; and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to complete service.

The order identifies the service address for both defendants as 234 Seventh Avenue, San Mateo, California 94401. The court stated that if the complaint is not served within 90 days after the summonses issue, Williford should request an extension of time. It also instructed her to notify the court in writing if her address changes and stated that the action may be dismissed if she fails to do so.

Ruling and Effect

Judge Rearden entered an order of service. The order directs the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to assist with serving the defendants; it does not decide the merits of Williford’s race- or sex-discrimination claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.