PKF OConnor Davies LLP v. Giordano
- Philip Halpern
- 7:23-cv-04898
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 6
In PKF O’Connor Davies v. Giordano, Judge Halpern granted an application and scheduled a conference about disputed document production.
PKF O’Connor Davies LLP and Frank Giordano, III; the order scheduled a conference concerning their discovery dispute rather than resolving the request for unredacted financial records.
What happened
PKF O’Connor Davies LLP asked the court to require Frank Giordano, III, to produce unredacted tax returns and bank statements in a dispute involving an alleged restrictive-covenant violation. Giordano opposed the request.
PKF O’Connor Davies said the redacted financial records were relevant to liability and damages. Giordano argued that the unredacted tax returns contained no additional relevant information and that the request was an improper fishing expedition.
Judge Philip M. Halpern granted the application, scheduled an in-person conference for May 21, 2024, about the discovery dispute, and directed the Clerk to terminate the pending motion sequence at Document 36. The order did not decide whether the documents had to be produced in unredacted form.
The detailed version
- PKF OConnor Davies LLP v. Giordano · No. 7:23-cv-04898
- Philip Halpern
- May 9, 2024
Background
The parties submitted a joint letter concerning a discovery dispute. PKF O’Connor Davies LLP asked to compel Frank Giordano, III, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 to reproduce documents without redactions. The disputed materials included tax returns and bank statements. The letter states that the court had previously ordered Giordano to produce responsive documents by April 22, 2024, and had ruled that he waived objections to the document requests. Giordano produced documents but kept certain income, expense, profit-or-loss, payor, and payment-amount information redacted.
The Parties’ Positions
PKF O’Connor Davies argued that the unredacted financial records were relevant to whether Giordano violated a restrictive covenant and to the amount of damages. It also argued that the redactions violated the earlier discovery order and that a confidentiality order addressed any privacy concerns.
Giordano opposed production of unredacted tax returns. He argued that the information already produced, including information in tax forms and financial records obtained through subpoenas to nonparties, supplied the relevant information. He characterized the request for unredacted tax returns as a fishing expedition and argued that the heightened standard for obtaining tax returns had not been met. The letter also reports Giordano’s additional arguments concerning the alleged restrictive-covenant violation, the federal trade-secret claim, and a Federal Trade Commission rule concerning noncompete clauses.
Court’s Action
Judge Philip M. Halpern granted the application and scheduled an in-person conference for May 21, 2024, at 2:45 p.m. in Courtroom 520 of the White Plains courthouse concerning the matters raised in the parties’ joint letter and their April 30 meet-and-confer discussion. The Clerk was directed to terminate the motion sequence pending at Document 36. The provided text does not show a ruling granting or denying the requested production of unredacted documents.
Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.