Urbano v. Seabreeze Fish Market Inc.
- Lorna Schofield
- 1:24-cv-01031
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Urbano v. Seabreeze Fish Market Inc., Judge Schofield ordered settlement materials and denied any motions as moot.
The parties to the case, including David Urbano and Seabreeze Fish Market Inc. and the other named defendants.
What happened
In Urbano v. Seabreeze Fish Market Inc., the parties told the court they had reached a settlement agreement in principle.
The court ordered the parties to submit the agreement and a joint letter with evidence addressing whether the settlement was fair and reasonable. It also canceled all conferences.
Judge Lorna G. Schofield denied any motions as moot. This order did not decide the underlying claims or approve the settlement.
The detailed version
- Urbano v. Seabreeze Fish Market Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-01031
- Lorna Schofield
- May 13, 2024
Background
On May 2, 2024, the court was informed that the parties had reached a settlement agreement in principle. The opinion does not describe the claims or the settlement’s terms.
Court’s action
The court ordered the parties, by May 31, 2024, to submit two items: the settlement agreement and a joint letter supported by evidence addressing the findings needed for the court to decide whether the settlement was fair and reasonable. The order cited decisions discussing judicial review of proposed settlements.
The court also ordered that all conferences be canceled and that any motions be denied as moot. The order did not state that the settlement had been approved and did not decide the underlying claims.
Disposition
Judge Lorna G. Schofield denied any motions as moot and directed the parties to submit settlement-approval materials. The opinion does not state any separate disposition of the case or claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.