Vinci Brands LLC v. Coach Services, Inc.
- Lorna Schofield
- 1:23-cv-05138
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Vinci Brands v. Coach Services, Judge Schofield ordered Debevoise & Plimpton to withdraw to avoid a judicial-recusal conflict.
Case-Mate, Inc., its attorneys from Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, and the three related litigations were affected. The order required the firm to withdraw and removed its individual attorneys as Case-Mate’s counsel of record.
What happened
Vinci Brands LLC v. Coach Services, Inc. is one of three related lawsuits involving Case-Mate, Inc.’s replacement of Vinci Brands as licensee for certain Coach and Kate Spade products. Debevoise & Plimpton LLP appeared for Case-Mate after extensive litigation had already occurred, with fact discovery scheduled to close on June 6, 2024.
The court said that the firm’s continued participation would require the judge to step aside because her impartiality could reasonably be questioned. The opinion does not explain the underlying circumstances that created the potential conflict.
Judge Lorna G. Schofield ordered Debevoise & Plimpton to withdraw from the related matters and directed the Clerk of Court to remove the firm’s individual attorneys as Case-Mate’s counsel of record. The order did not decide the parties’ underlying claims.
The detailed version
- Vinci Brands LLC v. Coach Services, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-05138
- Lorna Schofield
- May 13, 2024
Background
This order concerns two captioned actions: Vinci Brands LLC v. Coach Services, Inc., No. 23 Civ. 5138 (LGS), and Kate Spade LLC, et al. v. Vinci Brands LLC, et al., No. 23 Civ. 5409 (LGS). The court also identified a third related action, Coach IP Holdings, LLC v. ACS Group Acquisition LLC, No. 23 Civ. 10612 (LGS). All three matters included claims against Case-Mate, Inc. concerning Case-Mate’s replacement of Vinci Brands LLC as licensee for certain Coach and Kate Spade products. The court said the matters involved substantially similar parties and legal issues.
On May 9, 2024, attorneys from Debevoise & Plimpton LLP appeared for Case-Mate in all three related litigations. The court noted that extensive litigation had occurred, including 365 docket entries in the first captioned action and 267 in the second. Fact discovery was scheduled to close on June 6, 2024.
Reason for the Order
The court cited 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), which requires a judge to step aside when the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned. The court also cited the Code of Conduct for United States Judges. It determined that Debevoise & Plimpton’s continued appearance would require the court to recuse itself, and stated that the firm’s disqualifying circumstance was known or should have been known when the firm was retained.
Disposition
The court ordered Debevoise & Plimpton LLP to withdraw its appearance in the matters. It directed the Clerk of Court to strike the appearances of the firm’s individual attorneys as counsel of record for Case-Mate. The order addressed counsel and judicial recusal; it did not resolve the underlying claims or defenses.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.