Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 13, 2024

Delacruz v. Knox College

Judge
Garnett
Docket
1:24-cv-03595
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Delacruz v. Knox College, Judge Garnett ordered settlement discussions and a joint update, with the parties to consider whether Delacruz has standing.

Who this affects

Emanuel Delacruz, Knox College, and counsel or unrepresented parties who must comply with the settlement, reporting, and notice requirements.

What happened

In Delacruz v. Knox College, the court ordered the parties to meet and discuss settling the case. The order does not describe the claims or the events underlying the dispute.

Within 30 days after the summons and complaint are served, the parties must meet for at least one hour and discuss settlement, including whether Delacruz has standing to bring the case. Within 15 more days, they must jointly tell the court whether they settled and, if not, request mediation, a settlement conference before a magistrate judge, or an initial status conference.

Judge Margaret M. Garnett also directed counsel who have appeared to notify other parties or their lawyers of the order and the court’s rules. The court did not decide standing or the merits of the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Delacruz v. Knox College · No. 1:24-cv-03595
Judge
Garnett
Date
May 13, 2024

Order and requirements

The court ordered Emanuel Delacruz and Knox College to meet and confer—meaning meet and discuss the case—for at least one hour within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint. The parties must make a good-faith attempt to settle the action. As part of those discussions, they must consider whether Delacruz has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing, which concerns whether a person is legally entitled to bring a case.

If the parties cannot settle on their own, they must also discuss whether further settlement discussions through the court’s mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive at that time. Within 15 additional days, or within 45 days after service of the summons and complaint, the parties must submit a joint letter stating whether they settled. If they did not settle, the letter must request either mediation or a settlement conference before a magistrate judge, and state a preference between those options, or request an initial status conference.

Notice to parties and disposition

Counsel who had entered an appearance when the order was issued must promptly provide the order and Judge Garnett’s Individual Rules and Practices to counsel for parties who had not appeared, and file proof of that notice. If counsel do not know the identity of another party’s lawyer, they must send those materials directly to that party.

This order addresses settlement and case administration. It does not decide whether Delacruz has standing, resolve any claim, or determine the merits of the dispute. The court entered the requirements described above by order of Judge Margaret M. Garnett.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.