Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation v. Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.
- Vernon Broderick
- 1:24-cv-00870
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Milwaukee Electric Tool v. Mediterranean Shipping, Judge Broderick ordered a good-cause letter explaining delayed service or warned of dismissal.
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation must submit the required letter by May 24, 2024, or the action will be dismissed as stated in the order. Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. is the defendant potentially affected by that dismissal.
What happened
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation sued Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. on February 6, 2024. The opinion says Milwaukee Electric had not requested a summons, filed proof of service, or taken other steps to pursue the case.
The court ordered Milwaukee Electric to file a legal-supporting letter of no more than three pages by May 24, 2024. The letter must show good cause—an exceptional circumstance beyond the plaintiff’s control—for not serving Mediterranean Shipping within 90 days after filing the complaint.
Judge Vernon S. Broderick warned that failing to file the letter and show good cause would result in dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The order itself did not dismiss the case.
The detailed version
- Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation v. Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. · No. 1:24-cv-00870
- Vernon Broderick
- May 14, 2024
Background
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation filed this action against Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. on February 6, 2024. The court stated that Milwaukee Electric had not requested issuance of a summons, filed an affidavit of service, or taken any other action to prosecute the case as of May 14, 2024.
Order to Show Good Cause
The court ordered Milwaukee Electric to submit, no later than May 24, 2024, a letter of no more than three pages supported by legal authority. The letter must demonstrate good cause for failing to serve Mediterranean Shipping within 90 days after the complaint was filed, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).
The court explained that good cause generally exists only in exceptional circumstances where the failure to serve process timely resulted from circumstances beyond the plaintiff’s control. It also stated that courts consider the plaintiff’s diligence in attempting proper service and any prejudice to the defendant caused by the delay. The court noted that an attorney’s inadvertence, neglect, mistake, or misplaced reliance does not constitute good cause.
Disposition and Effect
Judge Vernon S. Broderick warned that Milwaukee Electric’s failure to submit the required letter and demonstrate good cause would result in dismissal of the action. The order did not itself dismiss the case or decide the underlying dispute.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.