Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 15, 2024

Scullark v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-03721
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro SeSocial Security
In one sentence

In Scullark v. Commissioner of Social Security, Judge Swain ordered Isaiah Scullark to pay fees or submit a complete application to proceed without paying them within 30 days.

Who this affects

The order primarily affects Isaiah Scullark, who must either pay the required fees or submit a sufficient amended application to proceed without prepaying them. The case will be dismissed if he does not comply within 30 days; the Commissioner of Social Security was not required to answer at this stage.

What happened

In Scullark v. Commissioner of Social Security, Isaiah Scullark filed the case without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying the filing fees. His application was mostly blank and did not provide enough information about his employment, assets, or expenses.

The court said it could not determine whether Scullark was unable to pay. The opinion first describes the required fees as $405, but the order later directs him to pay $402 or submit an amended application.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered Scullark to pay the fees or file the amended application within 30 days. The court said the action will be dismissed if he does not comply, and denied permission to appeal without paying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Scullark v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:24-cv-03721
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 15, 2024

Background

Isaiah Scullark brought this action without a lawyer. To proceed, he had to either pay the filing and administrative fees or submit an application to proceed without prepaying fees, commonly called an IFP application.

Scullark submitted an IFP application, but the court found it largely blank. He did not answer most questions about his employment, assets, or expenses. He stated that he had zero dollars in the bank and owned none of the listed valuable items, including an automobile, real estate, stocks, bonds, securities, jewelry, or artwork.

Court’s Action

The court could not determine from the incomplete application whether Scullark lacked enough money to pay the fees. The opinion initially states that the fees total $405, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee. The order later directs Scullark to pay $402 or submit an amended IFP application, creating an unexplained discrepancy in the amounts stated in the opinion.

Within 30 days of the order, Scullark must either pay the amount directed by the order or submit an amended application labeled with the case number and providing facts showing that he cannot pay. If the court grants the amended application, he may proceed without prepaying fees. No answer from the Commissioner of Social Security was required at that time.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered that the action will be dismissed if Scullark does not comply within the allowed time. The court also certified that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not dismiss the action at that time.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.