Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 16, 2024

Noel v. The City of New York

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:23-cv-03082
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Noel v. The City of New York, Judge Vyskocil denied the City’s request without prejudice of renewal and ordered Noel to produce five years of W-2 forms.

Who this affects

Gordon Noel must provide the City of New York with his W-2 forms from the previous five years by May 28, 2024. The City’s request to schedule a conference about compelling Noel’s 2018–2023 tax returns was denied without prejudice of renewal.

What happened

In Noel v. The City of New York, the City asked the court to schedule a conference about its expected request for Gordon Noel’s 2018–2023 tax returns. Noel objected, arguing that the request was too broad and burdensome, and the City said the returns were relevant to his lost-earnings and damages claims.

The court denied the City’s request for the conference without prejudice of renewal. The court found that the City had not shown that it was entitled to every part of Noel’s tax returns or that W-2 forms and other evidence of post-termination employment would be insufficient. The court nevertheless ordered Noel to provide his W-2 forms from the previous five years by May 28, 2024.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate docket entries 49 and 50. The order did not decide whether Noel ultimately must produce his tax returns.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Noel v. The City of New York · No. 1:23-cv-03082
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
May 16, 2024

Background

Gordon Noel, described in the opinion as a former correction officer, sued the City of New York under the Family and Medical Leave Act and the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. He alleges that his October 2022 termination violated those provisions and seeks damages including back pay and front pay.

The City served a supplemental document request seeking, among other things, Noel’s tax returns for 2018 through 2023. Noel objected that the request was overbroad and unduly burdensome. During the parties’ discussions, the City explained that it considered the returns relevant to Noel’s lost-earnings and mitigation-of-damages claims. The City also proposed obtaining the returns from the Internal Revenue Service if Noel completed an authorization form, but Noel refused to do so.

Court’s Ruling

The City asked the court to schedule a pre-motion conference concerning an anticipated motion to compel production of the tax returns. The court denied that request without prejudice of renewal. It stated that the City had not made even a preliminary showing that it was entitled to every aspect of the returns or that Noel’s W-2 forms and other evidence of post-termination employment would be insufficient to address mitigation of damages or other claims or defenses.

The court ordered Noel to produce his W-2 forms from the past five years to the City by May 28, 2024. It also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate docket entries 49 and 50. The order did not rule on whether the tax returns themselves must ultimately be produced.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.