Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 20, 2024

Feldman v. Mind Medicine, Inc.

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:23-cv-06169
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Feldman v. Mind Medicine, Inc., Judge Schofield ordered Feldman to file a three-page response to Mind Medicine’s discovery-dispute request.

Who this affects

Madeline Feldman must file a response of no more than three pages by May 21, 2024. Mind Medicine, Inc.’s discovery request was not resolved in the provided order.

What happened

In Feldman v. Mind Medicine, Inc., Mind Medicine asked the court to address a dispute over Feldman’s production of medical, employment, and income records. The defendant said Feldman had not provided certain authorizations and records.

The court ordered Feldman to file a response of no more than three pages by May 21, 2024. The order did not decide whether Feldman must produce the requested records or whether the defendant’s requested relief should be granted.

Judge Lorna G. Schofield issued the order on May 20, 2024. The opinion text provided does not include Feldman’s response or a later ruling on the discovery dispute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Feldman v. Mind Medicine, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-06169
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
May 20, 2024

Background

Mind Medicine’s May 16, 2024 letter requested a pre-motion conference about a discovery dispute. The letter alleged that Madeline Feldman had not produced certain medical-record authorization forms, pharmacy records, employment records, and income records. Mind Medicine said those materials were relevant to Feldman’s claims and to the defendant’s defenses, including defenses concerning claimed emotional distress and damages.

Mind Medicine also stated that it had served discovery requests, sent deficiency letters, and attempted to confer with Feldman’s counsel. The letter asked either for a pre-motion conference to seek permission to file a motion to compel or, alternatively, for an order compelling production. The provided text does not include Feldman’s position on the dispute.

Court’s Action

On May 20, 2024, the court ordered: “Plaintiff shall file a response, not to exceed three pages, by May 21, 2024.” The provided opinion does not state that the court granted or denied Mind Medicine’s request for a pre-motion conference, ordered production of any records, or resolved the parties’ discovery dispute. Judge Lorna G. Schofield signed the order.

Effect

The ruling required Feldman to submit a short written response by the specified deadline. The text provided does not show what happened after that response or whether the court later entered a decision on the requested discovery relief.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.