In Re: Jones
- Cathy Seibel
- 7:23-cv-08281
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In re Jones: Judge Seibel ordered pro se appellants to file missing bankruptcy-appeal materials or withdraw the appeal by June 4, 2024.
Shelly Jones and Warren Gregory Jones, the self-represented appellants in the bankruptcy appeal.
What happened
In re Shelly Jones and Warren Gregory Jones is a bankruptcy appeal in which the appellants did not file required appeal materials by the deadline.
Federal bankruptcy rules required the appellants to file and serve a list of the record items and the issues they wanted reviewed within 14 days after their appeal became effective. Their notice of appeal was docketed on August 29, 2023, making September 12, 2023, the deadline, but they did not file the required materials.
Judge Cathy Seibel ordered the appellants to file and serve the materials, or withdraw the appeal, by June 4, 2024. She stated that the appeal may be dismissed if they do neither. The order also explained that the Bankruptcy Court is not an appellee and that the appellants should identify the proper appellees if they continue.
The detailed version
- In Re: Jones · No. 7:23-cv-08281
- Cathy Seibel
- May 21, 2024
Background
Shelly Jones and Warren Gregory Jones, who were representing themselves, filed a notice of appeal from a bankruptcy-court matter. The Bankruptcy Court docketed their notice of appeal on August 29, 2023.
Required appeal filings
Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8009(a) requires an appellant to file with the bankruptcy clerk and serve on the appellee a designation of the items to be included in the record on appeal and a statement of the issues to be presented. The filings were due within 14 days after the appeal became effective or leave to appeal was granted. Based on the August 29, 2023 docketing date, the deadline was September 12, 2023. The appellants did not file the designation or statement by that date.
The court also noted that the appellants' civil cover sheet identified the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York as the defendant. The court explained that the Bankruptcy Court is not an appellee and that the appellants should identify the appropriate appellee or appellees if they continue the appeal.
Order
Judge Cathy Seibel ordered the appellants to file and serve the required designation and statement, or withdraw the appeal, by June 4, 2024. The court stated that if they failed to do either, the appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The order did not dismiss the appeal.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.