Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 22, 2024

Strike 3 Holdings,LLC v. Doe

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:24-cv-02522
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Strike 3 Holdings v. Doe, Judge Engelmayer ordered limited discovery to identify the defendant in a copyright case.

Who this affects

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, John Doe, and Astound Broadband. Strike 3 may seek Doe’s identifying information; Doe may challenge or seek anonymity regarding the subpoena; and Astound must provide notice, preserve information, and withhold disclosure while the specified periods or challenges are pending.

What happened

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC sued an unidentified person, called John Doe, alleging that the person downloaded and shared 25 of its movies. The movies contain pornographic material. Strike 3 asked to obtain the person’s name and address from Internet provider Astound Broadband.

The court ordered Astound Broadband to respond to a subpoena seeking John Doe’s name and current and permanent address. The provider must first notify Doe, who has 60 days to challenge the subpoena or ask to proceed anonymously. Astound may not release identifying information during that period or while a timely challenge is pending.

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer also required Astound to preserve the information and limited Strike 3’s use of any information disclosed to protecting its rights in this lawsuit. The court directed the Clerk to close the pending motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Strike 3 Holdings,LLC v. Doe · No. 1:24-cv-02522
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
May 22, 2024

Background

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC filed a copyright-infringement complaint against an unidentified defendant identified as John Doe, the subscriber assigned Internet Protocol address 70.18.210.129. Strike 3 alleged that Doe downloaded 25 of its motion pictures and distributed them to others. The opinion states that the movies contain pornographic material.

Strike 3 moved for permission to take expedited discovery—early information gathering before the normal discovery process—from Astound Broadband, the Internet service provider associated with the Internet address. Strike 3 sought Doe’s name and physical address so that it could identify and serve the defendant. The court found good cause for some expedited discovery because Strike 3 otherwise could not ascertain Doe’s identity for service. The court also recognized that the subscriber assigned an Internet address may not be the person who infringed a copyright and that an incorrect identification could create pressure to settle because of the risk of public association with pornographic films.

Order

The court ordered that Strike 3 may immediately serve Astound Broadband with a subpoena under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 seeking John Doe’s name and current and permanent address. A copy of the order must accompany the subpoena.

Strike 3 must immediately serve the order on Astound Broadband, and Astound must serve it on John Doe by a reasonable method, including first-class mail or overnight service to Doe’s last known address. Doe then has 60 days from service of the order to file a motion challenging the subpoena, including a motion to quash or modify it, or to request permission to litigate anonymously. Astound may not disclose Doe’s identifying information before that period expires. If Doe or Astound files a motion to quash, Astound may not disclose information until the court resolves the issue and directs Astound to resume production.

If no challenge is filed during the 60-day period, Astound has 10 days to produce information responsive to the subpoena. Astound must preserve the subpoenaed information while any timely motion to quash is pending. It must confer with Strike 3 and may not charge in advance for producing the information, although it may later provide Strike 3 with a billing summary and cost report. Any information disclosed may be used only to protect Strike 3’s rights described in the complaint.

Disposition and Effect

The court authorized limited expedited discovery subject to notice, a 60-day challenge period, possible anonymous litigation, preservation requirements, and a use restriction. The Clerk was directed to close the motion at Docket 6. This order addressed discovery and identification of the defendant; it did not decide whether John Doe committed copyright infringement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.