Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 23, 2024

Riley v. DNVB, Inc.

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:24-cv-03834
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Riley v. DNVB, Inc., Judge Tarnofsky ordered the parties to discuss settlement, consider standing, and report to the court.

Who this affects

Amanie Riley, DNVB, Inc., and the court, because the order requires the parties to meet, discuss settlement and standing, and submit a joint letter.

What happened

Riley v. DNVB, Inc. is a case brought by Amanie Riley against DNVB, Inc. The order does not describe the underlying claims.

The court ordered the parties to meet for at least one hour within 30 days after the summons and complaint were served. They must make a good-faith effort to settle and discuss whether Riley meets the legal requirement of standing, meaning a sufficient connection to the dispute to sue. If they cannot settle, they must also discuss mediation or a settlement conference.

Within 45 days after service, the parties must jointly tell the court whether they settled. If not, they must ask the court to refer the case to mediation, schedule a settlement conference, or hold an initial case-management conference. Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky signed the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Riley v. DNVB, Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-03834
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
May 23, 2024

Background

The opinion is an order in Amanie Riley’s case against DNVB, Inc. Riley’s complaint identifies her as bringing the case on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, but this order does not describe the claims or decide whether the case may proceed as a class action.

Orders Regarding Settlement and Standing

The court ordered the parties to meet and confer for at least one hour within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint. The meeting must include a good-faith attempt to settle the action. The parties were directed to consider whether Riley has standing, meaning the legal requirement that a plaintiff have a sufficient personal connection to the dispute. The order cited Second Circuit decisions discussing that threshold issue.

If the parties cannot settle on their own, they must also discuss whether additional settlement discussions through the court’s mediation program or before the magistrate judge would be productive at that time.

Required Joint Letter and Disposition

Within 45 days after service of the summons and complaint, the parties must submit a joint letter stating whether they settled. If they did not settle, the letter must request one of three next steps: referral to mediation, a date for a settlement conference, or an initial case-management conference.

The court did not decide the merits of the claims, the standing issue, or class certification. Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky entered the procedural order requiring these settlement-related steps.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.