Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled July 11, 2024

Ryss v. Loban Maple Leaf Properties, LP

Judge
Nathanael Cousins
Docket
5:23-cv-05072
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Judge Cousins conditionally dismissed Ryss v. Loban Maple Leaf Properties after settlement, with prejudice, while retaining jurisdiction for 45 days.

Who this affects

Valentina Ryss, Loban Maple Leaf Properties, LP, and the other defendants in the action.

What happened

In Valentina Ryss v. Loban Maple Leaf Properties, LP, the court was notified that the parties had settled the action and that no issue remained for the court to decide.

The court dismissed the action and all claims with prejudice, directed the clerk to close the case administratively, vacated all scheduled dates, and allowed any party to seek reopening within 45 days.

Judge Nathanael Cousins retained jurisdiction for 45 days and entered the order of conditional dismissal on July 11, 2024.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ryss v. Loban Maple Leaf Properties, LP · No. 5:23-cv-05072
Judge
Nathanael Cousins
Date
July 11, 2024

Background

The court was notified that the action had settled. The order states that no issue remained for the court to determine.

Ruling

The court ordered that the action and all claims asserted in it be dismissed with prejudice. It directed the clerk to administratively close the case, vacated all scheduled dates, and allowed any party to move to reopen the case if the motion was filed within 45 days. The court retained jurisdiction for 45 days.

Disposition and Classification

This was an order of conditional dismissal following notification of settlement. It did not decide the underlying claims on their merits, so the opinion is classified as a procedural order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.