Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 17, 2024

Hill v. Millet

Judge
Yvonne Rogers
Docket
4:24-cv-06572
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Hill v. Millet, Magistrate Judge Claire transferred the civil-rights case to the Northern District of California because venue was improper.

Who this affects

CYMEON V. HILL and the defendants are affected because the case was transferred from the Eastern District of California to the Northern District of California.

What happened

In CYMEYON V. HILL v. MILLET, et al., the plaintiff, who is confined at Napa State Hospital and representing himself, filed a civil-rights case under a federal law allowing claims against state officials. He had not paid the filing fee or submitted an application to proceed without paying it.

The court said the defendants were located in Napa County and that the claim arose there. Because Napa County is in the Northern District of California, the court determined that the case had been filed in the wrong district.

The court transferred the matter to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Magistrate Judge Allison Claire signed the order. The order did not decide the underlying civil-rights claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hill v. Millet · No. 4:24-cv-06572
Judge
Yvonne Rogers
Date
Sept. 17, 2024

Background

CYMEON V. HILL filed a civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The opinion says Hill is confined at Napa State Hospital and is proceeding without a lawyer. Hill had not paid the filing fee and had not filed an application to proceed without paying it under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Venue

The court applied the federal venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). It stated that the defendants were located in Napa County and that the claim arose there. Napa County is in the Northern District of California, so the court concluded that the action should have been filed in that district rather than the Eastern District of California.

Ruling

The court transferred the matter to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), which permits transfer of a case filed in the wrong district when doing so serves the interests of justice. Magistrate Judge Allison Claire entered the transfer order. The opinion does not decide the merits of Hill’s civil-rights claims or rule on the filing-fee issue.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.