Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled July 31, 2024

Howard v. Red Lake band of Chippewa

Judge
Jerry Blackwell
Docket
0:24-cv-01797
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Santee Howard v. Red Lake Band of Chippewa, Judge Blackwell dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute after finding no clear error.

Who this affects

The dismissal affected Santee Howard's case against the Red Lake Band of Chippewa and Red Lake Tribal Courts. The dismissal was without prejudice.

What happened

Santee Howard v. Red Lake Band of Chippewa involved Santee Howard as the petitioner and the Red Lake Band of Chippewa and Red Lake Tribal Courts as respondents. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute.

Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko recommended a result in a June 21, 2024 report. No timely objections were filed, so the district court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.

Judge Jerry W. Blackwell accepted the recommendation and dismissed the case without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) because of failure to prosecute. The court ordered that judgment be entered.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Howard v. Red Lake band of Chippewa · No. 0:24-cv-01797
Judge
Jerry W. Blackwell
Date
July 31, 2024

Background

The opinion identifies Santee Howard as the petitioner and the Red Lake Band of Chippewa and Red Lake Tribal Courts as the respondents. It does not provide details about the underlying claims or dispute.

Report and Recommendation

United States Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko issued a Report and Recommendation on June 21, 2024. No objections were filed within the permitted time. Under the applicable procedure, the district court therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error. Judge Blackwell found no clear error.

Ruling

The court accepted the Report and Recommendation. It dismissed the case without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and ordered judgment entered accordingly. The order does not explain the specific conduct underlying the failure-to-prosecute finding.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.