Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 23, 2024

Raper v. Millender

Judge
Jerry Blackwell
Docket
0:24-cv-02789
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Raper v. Millender, Judge Blackwell accepted the report and recommendation and dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

Who this affects

Jeramiah Christopher Raper and defendants Nate Millender, Darren Haugen, Dr. Shickler, and Centurion Health Care Provider.

What happened

In Raper v. Millender, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright issued a report and recommendation on August 22, 2024. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

No timely objections were filed. The court therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.

Judge Jerry W. Blackwell accepted the recommendation and dismissed the case without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. The court also directed that judgment be entered.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Raper v. Millender · No. 0:24-cv-02789
Judge
Jerry W. Blackwell
Date
Oct. 23, 2024

Background

Jeramiah Christopher Raper sued Nate Millender, Darren Haugen, Dr. Shickler, and Centurion Health Care Provider. The opinion does not describe Raper's claims or the events underlying the case.

Report and Recommendation

United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright issued a report and recommendation on August 22, 2024. No party filed objections within the permitted time. When no timely objection is filed, the district court reviews the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake. Judge Blackwell found no clear error.

Ruling

Judge Blackwell accepted the report and recommendation. The court dismissed the case without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. The order also directed that judgment be entered.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.