Harris v. Vang
- Jeffrey Bryan
- 0:24-cv-01791
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In Harris v. Vang, Judge Bryan adopted a magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissed Harris’s action without prejudice under Rule 41(b).
Joshua Harris, Toua Vang, and Andrew Nelson; the court dismissed Harris’s action without prejudice.
What happened
Joshua Harris sued Toua Vang and Andrew Nelson. The opinion does not explain the underlying allegations or why dismissal was recommended.
Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster recommended dismissing the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Harris did not object to that recommendation.
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan found no clear error, adopted the recommendation, and dismissed the action without prejudice. The court ordered that judgment be entered.
The detailed version
- Harris v. Vang · No. 0:24-cv-01791
- Jeffrey M. Bryan
- Oct. 31, 2024
Background
Joshua Harris brought this action against Toua Vang and Andrew Nelson. The opinion does not describe the claims or the events underlying the case.
Recommendation and Review
United States Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster issued a Report and Recommendation dated September 16, 2024. It recommended dismissing the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Harris did not file an objection. Because there was no timely objection, the district court reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake.
Ruling
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan found no clear error, adopted the Report and Recommendation, and dismissed the action without prejudice. The court ordered that judgment be entered accordingly. The opinion does not state the specific conduct or reason supporting the Rule 41(b) dismissal.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.