Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 1, 2024

Ultra Records, LLC v. Ultra International Music Publishing, LLC

Judge
Subramanian
Docket
1:22-cv-09667
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureEvidence
In one sentence

In Ultra Records v. Ultra International, Judge Subramanian granted requests to redact or seal specified exhibits and a declaration.

Who this affects

Ultra Records, LLC and Ultra International Music Publishing, LLC; the order concerns public access to specified filings and the protection of confidential business, financial, personal, and artist-related information.

What happened

In Ultra Records, LLC v. Ultra International Music Publishing, LLC, Ultra Records asked to file some materials with redactions and others under seal in connection with motions in the case.

The requested redactions covered three exhibits, while the materials sought to be sealed included an agreement and its schedules containing confidential business, financial, and personal information. Ultra Records also asked to redact a declaration referring to artists’ names and financial information. Ultra Records said it took no position on the merits of redactions requested by Ultra International Music Publishing.

The court granted the requests. Judge Arun Subramanian’s order allowed the specified exhibits and declaration to be filed in redacted form or under seal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ultra Records, LLC v. Ultra International Music Publishing, LLC · No. 1:22-cv-09667
Judge
Subramanian
Date
June 1, 2024

Background

Ultra Records, LLC, through its attorney, requested permission to file certain materials in redacted form or under seal. The request concerned filings connected with opposition to Ultra International Music Publishing, LLC’s motion for partial summary judgment and motions seeking to exclude evidence.

Requests

Ultra Records requested permission to file three exhibits in redacted form: Exhibit 3 to the Bruce R. Ewing declaration opposing the motion for partial summary judgment; Exhibit 2 to the Joshua Colangelo-Bryan declaration opposing the motion to exclude evidence regarding deductibility of expenses; and Exhibit 1 to the Joshua Colangelo-Bryan declaration opposing the motion to exclude expert Jeff Rougvie. Ultra Records stated that Ultra International contended these exhibits contained confidential information, and that Ultra Records took no position on the merits of those requested redactions.

Ultra Records also requested permission to file Exhibits 4 and 5 to the Ewing declaration under seal and the Carmine Coppola declaration in redacted form. The exhibits included an Asset Contribution and Membership Interest Purchase Agreement and its schedules, which Ultra Records described as containing confidential business and financial information, personal identifying information, and prior salary information. Ultra Records said the Coppola declaration referred to certain artists’ names and financial information that it considered highly confidential business information.

Ruling

The court stated, “The requests are GRANTED.” The order therefore granted the requests to file the specified exhibits and declaration in redacted form or under seal. The order did not decide the underlying summary-judgment or evidence-exclusion issues. Judge Arun Subramanian signed the order on May 31, 2024.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.