Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 6, 2024

Jean-Louis v. Governor State of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-04282
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Jean-Louis v. Governor State of New York, Judge Swain denied fee-waiver status and dismissed the complaint without prejudice under the PLRA’s three-strikes rule.

Who this affects

Joseph W. Jean-Louis, an incarcerated self-represented plaintiff, cannot proceed without paying filing fees in this action and remains barred from proceeding without paying them in future actions while incarcerated unless he shows an imminent danger of serious physical injury.

What happened

Joseph W. Jean-Louis, who is incarcerated, filed this case without a lawyer and did not pay the filing fee. The court treated his filing as a request to proceed without paying that fee. The complaint described ideas for building an underground nuclear fallout shelter.

The court said Jean-Louis had previously accumulated at least three qualifying dismissals, so the Prison Litigation Reform Act generally barred him from proceeding without paying the fee. The court also found that his complaint did not show that he faced an immediate danger of serious physical injury, which is an exception to that rule.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain denied Jean-Louis’s request to proceed without paying the filing fee and dismissed the complaint without prejudice. The court said he could start a new action by paying the filing fees, and it denied fee-waiver status for any appeal because an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jean-Louis v. Governor State of New York · No. 1:24-cv-04282
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 6, 2024

Background

Joseph W. Jean-Louis brought the action against Governor State of New York. He was incarcerated at the North Infirmary Command on Rikers Island and represented himself. Because he did not pay the filing fees, the court treated the filing as a request to proceed without paying those fees.

Three-strikes rule

The Prison Litigation Reform Act, specifically 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), generally prevents a prisoner from proceeding without paying filing fees if the prisoner has had three or more earlier actions or appeals dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or insufficiently pleaded. The statute contains an exception when the prisoner is under an imminent danger of serious physical injury.

The court stated that Jean-Louis was already barred from filing a new action without paying the fees while incarcerated because of three prior qualifying dismissals. The court also determined that his complaint did not demonstrate an imminent danger of serious physical injury. Instead, the complaint described his ideas for building an underground nuclear fallout shelter. The court therefore concluded that the statutory exception did not apply.

Ruling

The court denied Jean-Louis’s request to proceed without paying the filing fee and dismissed the complaint without prejudice under the three-strikes rule. The court explained that Jean-Louis could commence a new action by paying the filing fees; any such complaint would still be reviewed under the prisoner-screening statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.

The court also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-waiver status for purposes of an appeal. The Clerk of Court was directed to enter judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.