Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 27, 2024

Thompson v. Sullivan Correctional Facility

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-03720
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Thompson v. Sullivan Correctional Facility, Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice because Thompson failed to submit an original signature.

Who this affects

Tykhan Thompson’s complaint was dismissed without prejudice for failure to submit the required original signature. The court also denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fees.

What happened

In Thompson v. Sullivan Correctional Facility, the court ordered Tykhan Thompson to resubmit the complaint’s signature page with an original signature within thirty days.

The court had warned that failing to provide the signed page would lead to dismissal. Thompson did not submit it.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice. The court also denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fees and directed the clerk to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Thompson v. Sullivan Correctional Facility · No. 1:24-cv-03720
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 27, 2024

Background

The court had previously ordered Tykhan Thompson to resubmit the complaint’s signature page with an original signature within thirty days. The order warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal. Thompson did not submit the signed page.

Ruling

The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a). A dismissal without prejudice does not bar a later filing. The court did not decide the underlying claims.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fees. The clerk was directed to enter judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.