Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 2, 2024

McNaughton v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Judge
Ho
Docket
1:23-cv-01751
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureEmployment
In one sentence

In McNaughton v. United Parcel Service, Judge Ho granted a two-week extension for settlement-approval materials, setting a July 17, 2024 deadline.

Who this affects

The parties in McNaughton v. United Parcel Service, Inc., whose deadline for filing settlement-approval materials was extended.

What happened

In McNaughton v. United Parcel Service, Inc., the plaintiff’s lawyer asked for a two-week extension of the deadline to file materials seeking court approval of a settlement. The lawyer said the parties needed more time to finalize the settlement paperwork.

The court granted the application and directed the parties to file their materials for judicial approval by July 17, 2024. The court also directed the Clerk of Court to close ECF No. 40.

Judge Dale E. Ho issued the order on July 2, 2024. The order addressed only the filing deadline and did not discuss the settlement’s terms or the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
McNaughton v. United Parcel Service, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-01751
Judge
Ho
Date
July 2, 2024

Background

The plaintiff’s counsel requested a two-week extension of the July 1, 2024 deadline for filing a motion seeking judicial approval of the parties’ settlement. Counsel stated that additional time was needed to finalize the settlement paperwork and that no earlier extension request had been made.

Ruling

The court granted the application. It directed the parties to file their materials for judicial approval under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. by July 17, 2024. The Clerk of Court was directed to close ECF No. 40.

What the Order Did Not Decide

The order did not state the settlement’s terms, evaluate the underlying claims, or decide whether the settlement should ultimately be approved. It addressed the filing deadline only.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.