Pabon Perez v. O'Malley
- 1:24-cv-01917
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Pabon Perez v. O’Malley, the court reversed and remanded the Social Security case for further proceedings, a new hearing, and a new decision.
Maritza Pabon Perez and the Social Security Commissioner; the case returns to the agency for further proceedings, a new hearing, and a new decision.
What happened
In Pabon Perez v. O’Malley, the court ordered the action reversed and sent back to the Social Security Commissioner. The judgment relied on the parties’ stipulation and an order dated July 9, 2024.
The Commissioner must conduct further administrative proceedings, hold a new hearing, and issue a new decision. The opinion does not explain the underlying dispute or identify the specific reason for the remand.
The court entered the judgment on July 9, 2024. The opinion identifies Daniel Ortiz as the Acting Clerk of Court, but it does not name the judge.
The detailed version
- Pabon Perez v. O'Malley · No. 1:24-cv-01917
- July 9, 2024
Ruling
The court ordered that this action be reversed and remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). A sentence-four remand sends a Social Security case back to the agency for further proceedings after a court ruling. The judgment requires further administrative proceedings, a new hearing, and issuance of a new decision.
Basis and Scope
The judgment states that the reasons for the ruling were provided in the court’s stipulation and order dated July 9, 2024. The provided opinion does not describe the underlying claim, the agency’s earlier decision, or the specific error leading to the remand.
Disposition
The action was reversed and remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security. The opinion is dated July 9, 2024, and identifies Daniel Ortiz as Acting Clerk of Court. It does not name the judge.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.