Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 11, 2024

CUNNINGHAM v. SILVERSTEIN PROPERTIES-INC.

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-02304
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Cunningham v. Silverstein Properties-Inc., Judge Swain dismissed the action without prejudice because Cunningham did not obtain permission required by an earlier filing injunction.

Who this affects

Benjamin Cunningham; the action was dismissed without prejudice, and the court warned him of possible additional sanctions, including monetary penalties.

What happened

In Cunningham v. Silverstein Properties-Inc., Benjamin Cunningham alleged that a security guard assaulted him when he tried to serve a complaint at the World Trade Center. He also alleged that Port Authority police officers refused to arrest the guard and served him with a trespass notice.

Cunningham filed the action without a lawyer in New Jersey, and that court transferred it to the Southern District of New York. He asked to proceed without paying filing fees but had not asked for permission to file the case, even though an earlier court order required him to obtain permission before filing additional papers or lawsuits.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the action without prejudice for violating that earlier order. She warned that continued frivolous or duplicative filings could lead to additional sanctions, including monetary penalties, denied fee-free status for any appeal, and directed the clerk to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
CUNNINGHAM v. SILVERSTEIN PROPERTIES-INC. · No. 1:24-cv-02304
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 11, 2024

Background

Benjamin Cunningham filed this action without a lawyer. He originally filed it in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, which transferred it to the Southern District of New York. Cunningham alleged that, on November 12, 2020, a security guard assaulted him when he attempted to serve a complaint on Silverstein Properties, Inc. at the World Trade Center. He also alleged that Port Authority police officers refused to arrest the security guard and served him with a trespass notice.

Cunningham asked to proceed without paying the filing fee. The opinion states that he did not request permission to bring the action.

Prior Filing Injunction

The court explained that, on August 2, 2016, District Judge Deborah A. Batts issued an order barring Cunningham from filing additional papers or lawsuits without the court’s permission because of his unauthorized, repetitive, and frivolous litigation. The opinion also describes additional filing restrictions imposed on Cunningham, including a 2018 filing restriction by the Second Circuit and another 2018 injunction concerning repeated litigation arising from a 2005 incident.

Ruling

The court dismissed the action without prejudice because Cunningham failed to comply with the August 2, 2016 order. The court did not decide the merits of his allegations concerning the security guard or the Port Authority police officers. It stated that all other pending matters in the case were terminated.

The court warned that continued frivolous, duplicative, and non-meritorious litigation could result in additional sanctions, including monetary penalties. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The court directed the clerk to enter judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.