Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 19, 2024

LG Capital Funding, LLC v. E-Waste Systems, Inc.

Judge
Paul Gardephe
Docket
1:20-cv-04474
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
6
ContractCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In LG Capital Funding v. E-Waste Systems, Judge Gardephe adopted the damages recommendation and awarded LG Capital $493,322.22.

Who this affects

LG Capital Funding, LLC received a total judgment of $493,322.22. E-Waste Systems, Inc. is subject to that judgment, and the case was closed.

What happened

LG Capital Funding, LLC sued E-Waste Systems, Inc., claiming that E-Waste breached two convertible notes and was unjustly enriched. The court had already entered an order of default against E-Waste after it did not respond or appear.

Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses recommended damages, interest, and attorneys’ fees and costs. Neither party objected to that recommendation, and the court reviewed it for clear error.

Judge Gardephe adopted the recommendation in full, awarded LG Capital a total of $493,322.22, directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment, and closed the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
LG Capital Funding, LLC v. E-Waste Systems, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-04474
Judge
Paul Gardephe
Date
Aug. 19, 2024

Background

LG Capital Funding, LLC asserted claims for breach of contract and unjust enrichment against E-Waste Systems, Inc. The claims concerned two 8% convertible redeemable notes issued under a Securities Purchase Agreement. The notes had an aggregate principal amount of $168,000, with each note having a principal amount of $84,000.

LG Capital alleged that E-Waste failed to deliver shares after LG Capital submitted a notice converting part of the first note into common stock. LG Capital also alleged that E-Waste’s securities were revoked and its common stock was delisted, creating additional events of default under the notes. LG Capital claimed that these events triggered a 24% default-interest obligation and that E-Waste had not paid the outstanding principal and interest.

Procedural History

The complaint was filed on June 11, 2020. The Clerk issued a certificate of default against E-Waste on September 9, 2020. After E-Waste failed to respond to an order directing it to show why a default judgment should not be entered and failed to appear at the scheduled hearing, the court entered an order of default on November 19, 2020.

The court referred the case to Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses to determine damages. Judge Moses issued a report and recommendation on December 10, 2021. The report recommended damages for the two notes, default interest, and attorneys’ fees and costs. The parties received notice that failing to object would waive review, but neither party filed objections.

Court’s Review and Ruling

Because no objections were filed, the court reviewed the report and recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. Judge Gardephe stated that he had reviewed the twenty-page report and found it thorough and well-reasoned. He therefore adopted it in its entirety.

The court awarded LG Capital: (1) $158,720.38 in damages for the breaches of Note 1 and Note 2; (2) $127,127.78 in default interest on Note 1; (3) $196,729.26 in default interest on Note 2; and (4) $10,744.80 in attorneys’ fees and costs. The total award was $493,322.22. The Clerk of Court was directed to enter judgment and close the case.

Classification

This was a default judgment based on E-Waste’s nonappearance and failure to respond. Under the applicable classification convention, it is a procedural order because the underlying claims were not tested through an adversarial merits proceeding.

The authoritative version

Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.