Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 22, 2024

Johnson v. Esports Entertainment Group, Inc.

Judge
Katharine Parker
Docket
1:22-cv-10861
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Johnson v. Esports Entertainment Group, Judge Parker ordered service and a response to a settlement-enforcement motion, warning default could follow.

Who this affects

Grant Johnson and Esports Entertainment Group, Inc.; Johnson must serve the motion and file proof of service, while the company must respond through counsel.

What happened

In Johnson v. Esports Entertainment Group, Inc., the court instructed Grant Johnson to serve the defendant with his motion to enforce the settlement agreement and with the court’s order. Johnson must file proof of service by August 29, 2024.

Esports Entertainment Group, Inc.’s response is due September 12, 2024. The company’s former counsel said that counsel no longer represents it. The court warned that a corporation cannot represent itself and that failing to oppose the motion through a lawyer may result in a default judgment. The order did not decide whether the settlement agreement should be enforced.

Judge Katharine H. Parker issued the order on August 22, 2024.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Johnson v. Esports Entertainment Group, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-10861
Judge
Katharine Parker
Date
Aug. 22, 2024

Order

At an August 22, 2024 conference, the court directed Plaintiff to serve Esports Entertainment Group, Inc. with a copy of the motion to enforce the settlement agreement and a copy of the order in a form complying with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5. Plaintiff must file proof of service by August 29, 2024.

Response Deadline and Representation

The defendant must respond to the motion by September 12, 2024. The defendant’s previous counsel represented that counsel no longer represents Esports Entertainment Group, Inc. The court advised that a corporate entity may not proceed without counsel. It further warned that failure to oppose the motion through counsel may result in entry of a default judgment.

Disposition

The order set service and response requirements and issued a warning about possible default judgment. It did not rule on the motion to enforce the settlement agreement or enter a default judgment. Judge Katharine H. Parker signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.