Rivera v. Eastland Assoc Corp.
- Katharine Parker
- 1:22-cv-00707
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Rivera v. Eastland Assoc Corp., Judge Parker granted enforcement of the settlement and entered a $25,000 judgment against the defendants.
Santos Rivera received a $25,000 judgment against Eastland Assoc Corp. and Benedetto Cupo, who are jointly and severally liable. Rivera may also apply for reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred to enforce the settlement and judgment.
What happened
Santos Rivera sued Eastland Assoc Corp. and Benedetto Cupo in a wage-and-hour case, and the parties later reached a settlement that the court approved.
The settlement required the defendants to pay $25,000, including attorneys’ fees and costs. The court retained authority to enforce the agreement. Rivera moved to enforce it, and the court ordered the defendants to explain why judgment should not be entered; they did not respond.
Judge Katharine H. Parker granted Rivera’s motion and ordered a $25,000 judgment against the defendants. The defendants are jointly and individually responsible for the full amount, and Rivera may seek reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs connected with enforcing the judgment.
The detailed version
- Rivera v. Eastland Assoc Corp. · No. 1:22-cv-00707
- Katharine Parker
- Nov. 14, 2024
Background
Santos Rivera brought this wage-and-hour case individually and on behalf of similarly situated people against Eastland Assoc Corp. and Benedetto Cupo. The parties reached a settlement, which the court approved on July 5, 2023. Under the agreement, the defendants agreed to pay $25,000, including attorneys’ fees and costs. The court retained jurisdiction, meaning it kept authority to enforce the settlement agreement.
Rivera moved to enforce the settlement agreement on August 26, 2024. The agreement provided that, after notice of a breach and seven calendar days to cure it, all amounts due would become immediately payable. It also provided that, if the defendants defaulted and judgment was entered, they would be jointly and severally liable for the amount due and for reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred to enforce the agreement and judgment.
On September 12, 2024, the court ordered the defendants to show cause by October 2, 2024, why judgment should not be entered for $25,000 based on noncompliance with the settlement. The defendants did not respond.
Ruling
Judge Katharine H. Parker granted Rivera’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement and for entry of judgment. The court ordered judgment in Rivera’s favor against the defendants for $25,000. The defendants are jointly and severally liable, meaning Rivera may enforce the full amount against either defendant or both. The court also stated that Rivera may apply for fees and costs associated with enforcing the judgment.
Disposition
The motion was GRANTED. Judgment was ordered in favor of Rivera against the defendants for $25,000. The opinion did not itself award a specific additional amount for attorneys’ fees or costs.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.