Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 28, 2024

Doncouse v. Elymar Restaurant Corporation

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:24-cv-03327
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Doncouse v. Elymar, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice and without costs, while allowing a 30-day reopening application.

Who this affects

Graciela Doncouse, Elymar Restaurant Corporation, and West 50th St. Associates, L.L.C.; the case was closed after the parties reported reaching an agreement on all issues.

What happened

In Doncouse v. Elymar Restaurant Corporation, the parties told the court that they had reached an agreement on all issues. The opinion does not describe the agreement’s terms.

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and deadlines and dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees. The Clerk was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

Judge Valerie Caproni allowed the parties to apply within 30 days to reopen the case if they showed good cause. The parties could also ask the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce their settlement by submitting the agreement and a request within that same period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Doncouse v. Elymar Restaurant Corporation · No. 1:24-cv-03327
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Aug. 28, 2024

Background

Plaintiff Graciela Doncouse sued Elymar Restaurant Corporation and West 50th St. Associates, L.L.C. On August 21, 2024, the parties notified the court that they had reached an agreement on all issues. The opinion does not state the agreement’s terms.

Order

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

Reopening and Settlement Enforcement

The parties may apply to reopen the case within 30 days of the order. Any such application must show good cause for keeping the case open in light of the settlement. An application filed after 30 days, or filed without a showing of good cause, may be denied on that basis alone.

If the parties want the court to retain jurisdiction—the court’s authority—to enforce their settlement agreement, they must, within the same 30-day period, submit the agreement under Rule 7.A of the court’s Individual Practices and ask the court to issue an order expressly retaining jurisdiction. Judge Valerie Caproni entered the order on August 28, 2024.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.