Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 21, 2026

CSX Transportation, Inc. v. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:25-cv-10411
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2

Counsel1 of record
PLAINTIFF
John Martin Murtagh , Jr Murtagh, Cossu, Venditti & Castro-Blanco LLP

Counsel of record per CourtListener. Firm names are approximate.

Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In CSX TRANSPORATION v. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice and without costs, allowing possible reopening within 60 days.

Who this affects

CSX TRANSPORATION, INC. and ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERVICES LTD.; the case was closed after settlement, subject to the order’s 60-day procedures for seeking reopening or continued jurisdiction to enforce the settlement.

What happened

CSX TRANSPORATION, INC. v. ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERVICES LTD. followed a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Parker on August 20, 2026. The parties signed a binding terms sheet agreeing in principle to resolve all issues in the case.

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party, directed the clerk to terminate all open motions, and closed the case.

Judge Valerie Caproni also allowed the parties to apply to reopen the case within 60 days if they showed good cause. To have the court retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement, the parties had to submit their settlement agreement and request continued jurisdiction within that same period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd · No. 1:25-cv-10411
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Aug. 21, 2026

Background

On August 20, 2026, the parties participated in a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Parker. The conference resulted in a signed binding terms sheet in which the parties agreed in principle to resolve all issues in the litigation.

Order

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The clerk was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

The court stated that, within 60 days, the parties could apply to reopen the case. Any such application had to show good cause for keeping the case open despite the settlement and had to be filed within the 60-day period. A request filed after that period or without a showing of good cause could be denied on that basis alone.

If the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction—the authority to enforce the settlement agreement—they had to submit the settlement agreement and request an order expressly retaining jurisdiction within the same 60-day period, in accordance with the court’s cited procedures.

Disposition

Judge Valerie Caproni dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, terminated the open motions, and closed the case. The order also provided a 60-day opportunity to seek reopening or to request that the court retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.