CSX Transportation, Inc. v. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd
- Valerie Caproni
- 1:25-cv-10411
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
Counsel of record per CourtListener. Firm names are approximate.
In CSX TRANSPORATION v. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice and without costs, allowing possible reopening within 60 days.
CSX TRANSPORATION, INC. and ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERVICES LTD.; the case was closed after settlement, subject to the order’s 60-day procedures for seeking reopening or continued jurisdiction to enforce the settlement.
What happened
CSX TRANSPORATION, INC. v. ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERVICES LTD. followed a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Parker on August 20, 2026. The parties signed a binding terms sheet agreeing in principle to resolve all issues in the case.
The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party, directed the clerk to terminate all open motions, and closed the case.
Judge Valerie Caproni also allowed the parties to apply to reopen the case within 60 days if they showed good cause. To have the court retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement, the parties had to submit their settlement agreement and request continued jurisdiction within that same period.
The detailed version
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd · No. 1:25-cv-10411
- Valerie Caproni
- Aug. 21, 2026
Background
On August 20, 2026, the parties participated in a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Parker. The conference resulted in a signed binding terms sheet in which the parties agreed in principle to resolve all issues in the litigation.
Order
The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The clerk was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.
The court stated that, within 60 days, the parties could apply to reopen the case. Any such application had to show good cause for keeping the case open despite the settlement and had to be filed within the 60-day period. A request filed after that period or without a showing of good cause could be denied on that basis alone.
If the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction—the authority to enforce the settlement agreement—they had to submit the settlement agreement and request an order expressly retaining jurisdiction within the same 60-day period, in accordance with the court’s cited procedures.
Disposition
Judge Valerie Caproni dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, terminated the open motions, and closed the case. The order also provided a 60-day opportunity to seek reopening or to request that the court retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.