Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 30, 2024

Clark v. The State of New York

Judge
Kenneth Karas
Docket
7:22-cv-06635
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Clark v. The State of New York, Judge Karas dismissed the petition, adopted the Report and Recommendation, and declined to issue a certificate of appealability.

Who this affects

Eric Wade Clark and the State of New York and the other respondents named in the case.

What happened

In Clark v. The State of New York, the court adopted in full a Report and Recommendation dated August 5, 2024. The opinion provided does not explain the underlying claims or the recommendation’s reasoning.

The court dismissed the petition. It also decided that no certificate of appealability would issue because the petitioner had not made the required substantial showing that a constitutional right was denied.

The court further certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, and the case was closed. The ruling was issued under Judge Kenneth Karas.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Clark v. The State of New York · No. 7:22-cv-06635
Judge
Kenneth Karas
Date
Aug. 30, 2024

Ruling

The court adopted in its entirety the Report and Recommendation dated August 5, 2024, for the reasons stated in the court’s August 30, 2024 Order. The petition was dismissed.

The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability. It stated that the petitioner had not made a substantial showing that a constitutional right was denied, citing 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). A certificate of appealability is a document required for certain appeals from the denial of a petition challenging custody or detention.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. The case was closed. The provided judgment does not state why the petition was dismissed, and it does not include the reasoning from the adopted Report and Recommendation or the August 30 Order. The ruling was issued under Judge Kenneth Karas.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.