Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 30, 2024

Slade v. City of New York

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:24-cv-00514
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil RightsSection 1983Pro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Slade v. City of New York, Judge Furman ordered U.S. Marshals service for Slade’s pro se civil-rights lawsuit.

Who this affects

Ricco Devon Slade and the defendants named in his federal civil-rights lawsuit, including the City of New York; the Clerk of Court and U.S. Marshals Service must carry out the service-related instructions.

What happened

In Slade v. City of New York, Ricco Devon Slade, who is incarcerated, brought a civil-rights lawsuit under federal law without a lawyer. The court had previously allowed him to proceed without paying filing fees upfront.

The court directed the Clerk to issue summonses and provide the U.S. Marshals Service with the paperwork needed to serve the defendants. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summonses are issued and requested that the City of New York waive service.

Judge Jesse M. Furman also instructed Slade to notify the court of any address change and explained that the case could be dismissed if he failed to do so. The order addressed service and related instructions; it did not decide whether Slade’s claims were legally valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Slade v. City of New York · No. 1:24-cv-00514
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Sept. 30, 2024

Background

Ricco Devon Slade, who is incarcerated at Auburn Correctional Facility, filed this action without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law that allows certain civil-rights claims against state or local officials and entities. The opinion states that the court had previously granted Slade permission to proceed without paying the filing fee upfront.

Because Slade was proceeding without a lawyer and had received that permission, the court stated that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants.

Order

The court directed the Clerk of Court to issue summonses for each defendant, complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, and send the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service. The Clerk was also directed to mail Slade an information package and a copy of the order.

The court extended the time for service until 90 days after the summonses are issued. If the complaint is not served within that period, Slade must request an extension. The court also stated that Slade must notify it in writing if his address changes and that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so.

The court requested that the City of New York waive service of the summons. It also notified the New York City Department of Correction and the New York City Law Department of the order. The order identified a private organization, the City Bar Justice Center, as a possible source of limited legal assistance, while explaining that the organization is not part of the court and cannot accept court filings for Slade.

Disposition and significance

The court entered an order of service. It did not rule on the merits of Slade’s civil-rights claims or determine whether any defendant violated federal law. The ruling was limited to arranging service and providing related procedural instructions.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.